Hi there everyone it's Vorknark in New York, a special two hour program today focused

on extremism and hate and the perils of platforming it.

In a post-Dominion versus Fox World we know that news organizations take on enormous

risk when they platform or the legal word as we all learned is publish things that they

know to be false.

They risk their reputations and in the rare instances where actual malice can be established

they also face legal exposure.

This knowledge of falsity on Fox's part was established through mountains of internal

communications that proved that the producers, the executives and the anchors knew that claims

of massive voter fraud were false ahead of time and then they broadcast them anyway.

The case Dominion had against Fox was so strong that by the time the trial commenced

the only thing the jury was going to have to determine was whether Fox met that really

really high legal bar of acting with actual malice when it knowingly published falsities

about Dominion.

Now as we all know instead of standing trial Fox decided to settle for close to $800

million.

What we all know from that discovery process is that Dominion established from the top

of that company to the bottom from Rupert Murdoch to Tucker Carlson to the fact checkers

to the reporters and the news managers.

They all knew ahead of time pre broadcast that the content was false.

So what does that do?

Well for today's purposes it reframes our questions today about the risk involved to one's reputation

...