Hey dude, what's up? We meet again. I'm kidding. Hi, beautiful people of the internet. I've been so

excited to sit down in this chair and talk to you guys. I've been looking forward to it all day,

which is kind of silly considering that at the end of the day, I am sitting in a room talking to

myself. I'm sorry if I'm yelling into the microphone. I also had a ton of caffeine today, so be aware. Hope all of you guys are doing well.

I hope all of your weeks are off to a good start. Today's case is a well-known case, but one that has

had a lot of arguments surrounding it. And I can't wait to hear what you have to say because I can

kind of see it from both sides, but we'll explain once we get into the nitty-gritty.

All right, you guys, you ready?

Does everyone have your snack of choice?

Is everyone driving safely if you are?

Eyes on the road.

Let's go.

In 2002, 27-year-old Lacey Peterson was eight months pregnant when she vanished from her home in California.

What followed was a nationwide search that ended in heartbreak when the bodies of Lacey and her

unborn son were discovered. Scott Peterson, her husband, was arrested, tried, and sentenced to death

in 2004. Four years the public saw this as a clear-cut case. It just made sense. There were really

not that many questions to begin with when this all began, but in the two decades since,

a growing number of people have started to question Scott's guilt. There is a huge argument these

days on whether or not you believe Scott is guilty or he's innocent. There are also a lot of

serious concerns about whether or not Scott truly got the fair guilty or he's innocent. There are also a lot of serious concerns about

whether or not Scott truly got the fair trial that he deserved. As time passes and new details

continue to surface, more and more people are left with a question, was Scott Peterson a killer?

...