The Patrick Madrid Show: November 18 2024 - Hour 2
The Patrick Madrid Show
Relevant Radio
4.8 • 590 Ratings
🗓️ 18 November 2024
⏱️ 51 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Patrick discusses voter ID laws and their effects, highlighting a judge's decision to support Huntington Beach’s voter ID measure against California's stance. Patrick points out the inconsistency where ID is needed for daily tasks like buying alcohol and getting jobs, but not for voting in California. Curious about the double standard, this is the show for you!
- The State of California took the Southern California city of Huntington Beach to court for daring to require ID to vote (00:38)
- Wesley - I am in favor of showing ID to vote. I think we need to say that voting is a constitutional right. (07:33)
- Rich - I was paid by registered voter officials on how to commit voter fraud in CA. It told me how to commit voter fraud if people were motivated. (10:15)
- Lee (email) - Owning a gun is a constitutional right and you have to show ID and more
- Audio: Bill Clinton - as to why the Palestinians don’t have a state (18:20)
- Lisa - I was a pole challenger in NM and I agree with what Rich was saying in CA (23:58)
- Kathleen - Voter ID: I am wondering if you think people should show an ID before they receive communion. (28:00)
- Margaret Mary - I catechized as a young person that we would go to hell if we missed Mass (34:54)
- Philip - Voting procedures are different in different states. (43:43)
- Pamela - Voter ID: I am disabled but I never miss going to the poles. I have noticed things are much more different (48:24)
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Compelling insights, unpredictable conversations, |
| 0:12.7 | encouragement for your day. |
| 0:14.8 | It's the Patrick Madrid show on Relevant Radio. |
| 0:20.0 | Hour one down, hour two is here, and you can participate by calling 888 911 |
| 0:25.6 | 911. |
| 0:26.6 | It should be some info. |
| 0:28.6 | Go ahead. |
| 0:29.6 | Okay, I'll try that. |
| 0:30.6 | 888, 914914949. |
| 0:33.6 | Emails can go to me, Patrick at Relevantradio.com. |
| 0:36.6 | Now, I have a few things for your good to know file I at Relevantradio.com. |
| 0:40.4 | Now, I have a few things for your good to know file I want to share with you. |
| 0:42.3 | If you're in California, you probably already know this. |
| 0:51.3 | But last week, a judge in California rejected the state of California's lawsuit against the city of Huntington Beach over a local measure. I'm quoting here from the Associated Press, over a local measure allowing |
| 0:55.6 | officials to require voter ID at the polls. Seems like an obvious common sense thing to do. |
| 1:01.8 | Show ID if you're going to vote. Orange County Superior Court Judge Nico Durbetas, if I'm saying it |
| 1:07.9 | correctly, ruled that existing state law does not block the local |
| 1:10.9 | measure, which was approved by voters earlier this year. The ruling could clear the way for the |
| 1:16.0 | majority Republican city to implement one of California's only voter ID requirements at the polls in |
| 1:23.0 | local elections. City attorney Michael Gates said of the ruling, it's a massive black eye to the state |
| 1:28.1 | of California. And what the state of California needs to know if they haven't found out already is |
| 1:32.9 | Huntington Beach is not going to be intimidated or deterred. So what's going on here is that the local |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Relevant Radio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Relevant Radio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.