The Patrick Madrid Show: July 08, 2024 - Hour 3

The Patrick Madrid Show

Relevant Radio

Religion & Spirituality, Christianity

4.8 • 588 Ratings

🗓️ 8 July 2024

⏱️ 51 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Did you know that for a host to be valid in the Catholic Church, it must contain gluten? Patrick explores church guidelines, potential alternatives like low-gluten hosts, and how parishes can navigate these sensitivities.

Email – Rejecting IVF is like rejecting all medical experiments (00:42)
Elalis - The father of my son (we’re divorced) is teaching my son about Protestant traditions when I am trying to raise him Catholic. How can I help my son stay in the Catholic Church? (14:13)
Email – Is there a gluten free host available to those who are gluten intolerant? (21:38)
Megan - Is it ok to wear sweats at a weekday Mass? (27:40)
Scott - Does my burial plot need to be consecrated since it is not in a Catholic cemetery? (30:14)
Mary – I have Celiac disease so I take a very small piece of the low gluten host, and the priest gives it to me in my pyx and there is no contamination. (32:01)
Susan – What should be done with a miscarried embryo? (42:59)
Sam – I finally had the opportunity to take the Precious Blood (46:23)
Matt - What are your thoughts on the dialog form of the Latin Mass (TLM)? (48:42)

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Compelling insights, unpredictable conversations,
0:12.7	encouragement for your day.
0:14.8	It's the number to call
0:29.5	888 914 914914949 888 914 9149 I thought this was an interesting email. This came in just a few minutes ago from Michael in Seattle, and we talked about in vitro fertilization a bit in the last hour. So it's based upon that. If you didn't hear that, then just tune in about an hour after the show is over. Go to relevant radio.com or use the relevant radio app, and you'll be able to
0:54.6	hear the whole show. It's usually posted by then. So you want to listen to the second hour if this,
1:00.4	if that discussion isn't something you heard. But anyway, here's what Michael has the saying. He says,
1:06.6	IVF, a flaw in your logic. He says, do you have a flaw in your logic on IVF, which stands for
1:12.3	in vitro fertilization? IVF is a medical technique, like all other medical techniques, used with a single
1:19.8	fertilized embryo. It is productive techniques, not destructive. Let's pause there. So yes, that's true, but the typical procedure involves
1:32.3	multiple fertilized ova. It's not common, and who knows it may be rare for all I know, but I know
1:40.2	it's not common to fertilize a single ovum.
1:50.9	It's usually several ova, and the upward number, I don't know what that would be.
1:55.3	But that's a little tweak to what you're saying here, as a matter of fact.
2:03.7	By simply calling this medical technique a laboratory experiment puts you in danger of rejecting all medical techniques.
2:06.4	Let's pause there.
2:08.9	The logic doesn't follow.
2:11.5	So I would offer this critique that it doesn't logically follow that if you identify a medical technique as a laboratory experiment,
2:20.2	that therefore you are now in danger of rejecting all medical techniques that doesn't logically
2:25.0	follow. If you identify, let's say, the medical experiment, I'm sorry, if you identify, to go back
2:34.0	to that analogy that I used earlier,
2:36.1	about two concentration camps run by a dictator, that concentration camp over there, the people
2:43.1	who go into that one, they're killed off, they're gassed, their bodies are burned in crematorium.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Relevant Radio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Relevant Radio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.