The Neglected Constitutional History That Disqualifies Trump
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
Slate Audio
4.6 • 3.4K Ratings
🗓️ 3 February 2024
⏱️ 57 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
There haven’t been that many insurrections in the United States, which means the case law ahead of next week’s arguments in Trump v. Anderson (the 14th Amendment, Section 3 disqualification case) is pretty thin. And so we, and presumably the justices, must rely on text and history to understand the intent of the drafters of the Reconstruction Amendments. Civil war and reconstruction historian Professor Manisha Sinha, signatory of one amicus brief and cited in another, explains that the history is crystal clear. Trump must be disqualified from the ballot. After weeks of discussing concerns about the strategic, political implications of this case, this week Dahlia Lithwick tackles the text and the history head-on, in a case that’s almost a natural experiment in applying originalism on its own terms.
See also:
Amicus Brief signed by 25 civil war and reconstruction historians (including Professor Sinha)
Abraham Lincoln’s Lyceum Address
Sean Wilentz: The Case for Disqualification, New York Review of Books
Jamelle Bouie: If It Walks Like an Insurrection and Talks Like an Insurrection... NY Times
In this week’s Amicus Plus segment, Slate’s judicial diviner Mark Joseph Stern joins to talk about a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on abortion that really took both text and history and human rights seriously. Also, an 8th circuit decision that could put a stake in the heart of what remains of the voting rights act.
Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.
Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | We're going to pause now to hear from one of our great sponsors on this week's show, |
| 0:08.0 | The Baptist Joint Committee, and their podcast respecting religion. |
| 0:12.8 | As a listener of amicus, you know that the Supreme Court is slowly eroding the wall |
| 0:17.7 | between church and state brick by brick. |
| 0:21.1 | What you may not know is how a Baptist group fights for both religion clauses of the First |
| 0:27.0 | Amendment protecting that wall of separation. |
| 0:30.5 | The respecting Religion Podcast is hosted by Amanda Tyler and Holler The You are worried about Christian nationalism, authoritarian |
| 0:43.1 | theocracy, and the misuse of the term, quote, |
| 0:45.9 | religious freedom to harm others. |
| 0:48.0 | Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. guests. |
| 0:57.0 | Like some kind of Pizza Ninja, Domino's are slicing their prices. Domino's are slicing their prices. |
| 1:01.0 | Domino's price slice. Small pizzas now 8 quid, |
| 1:05.0 | medium now 10 quid and large now 12 quid. |
| 1:08.0 | Yet we're making cuts too. |
| 1:10.0 | In 11th of February 24, minimum delivery spend charges and areas may apply |
| 1:14.4 | to see dominoes dot co-dotco. UK. |
| 1:18.0 | We have to learn from the past. The one thing that we must learn is that when people get away with violating the rule of law, |
| 1:27.3 | it's not as if they learn their lesson. |
| 1:29.5 | It seems to me that it encourages them to act with further impunity. |
| 1:35.0 | Hi and welcome back to Amicus. This is Slate's podcast about the courts and the |
| 1:47.4 | law and the Supreme Court and the rule of law in a constitutional democracy. |
| 1:52.2 | I am Deli Lothwick. That's my beat at Slate. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Audio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Audio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.