Let's talk about one of the most emotionally charged subjects there is, abortion, but in an unemotional way.

Also, let's not touch on the question that most preoccupies discussion of the subject, whether abortion should be legal or illegal.

The only question here is the moral one, is ending the life of a human fetus, moral.

Let's begin with this question.

Does the human fetus have any value and any rights?

Now, it's a scientific fact that a human fetus is human life.

Those who argue that the human fetus has no rights say that a fetus is not a person.

But even if you believe that, it doesn't mean the fetus has no intrinsic value or no rights.

There are many living beings that are not persons that have both value and rights.

Dogs and other animals, for example, and that's moral argument number one.

A living being doesn't have to be a person in order to have intrinsic moral value and rights.

When challenged with this argument, people usually change the subject to the rights of the mother, meaning the right of a mother to end her fetus' life.

Under any circumstance for any reason and at any time in her pregnancy.

Is that moral?

It is only if we believe that the human fetus has no intrinsic worth.

But in most cases, nearly everyone believes that the human fetus has essentially infinite worth.

And then almost absolute right to live.

When a pregnant woman wants to give birth, then society and the human life is not a person.

And its laws regard the fetus as so valuable that if someone were to kill that fetus, that person could be prosecuted for homicide.

Only if a pregnant woman doesn't want to give birth.

Do many people regard the fetus as worthless?

Now, does that make sense?

...