The reason we're here, and I don't think you would argue that this is unnecessary, the assassination in cold blood is an act of terrorism of Charlie Kirk.

Is that political violence?

You seem so confident on the Hortmans, but not Charlie Kirk?

I would, well, no, I would say. I was just thinking about your question.

If that doesn't constitute political violence that could be answered in the affirmative immediately, of course, what would?

Hey, YouTube, what you're about to watch is a new segment we call Change My Mind.

Welcome back to Change My Mind.

It's been a while.

This is the place where we rationalize, we reasoned our positions on controversial topics.

When I created Change My Mind in 2017, I had one goal in mind, and that was to shine a light on the institutions that had failed Americans.

Often, students propagandized by the educational system, as well as legacy media.

Mr. Trump's once again defending comments he made about the white supremacists and neo-nizant.

There were very fine people on both sides.

The president's statement that both sides are responsible for the violence and

charges. It was designed to bring genuine dialogue to what had become an impenetrable

echo chamber dominated by progressive professors, administrators, student leadership, along

with a complicit media and big tech establishment.

To put it simply, the kind of dialogue that evaded all of cable news.

I know. I know you said that.

He said I was being hyperbolic. Let me respond.

I'm not, you being a white man as a man, something.

That just shows you the ridiculousness of all of this.

...