This video

archive.

by your copy today at Corbett report.

Welcome. This is James Corbett of Cor Corporate Report.com with the last word on terrorism.

In an interview with Bloomberg earlier this month regarding the unfolding political unrest in Egypt,

Henry Kissinger made at least one very telling statement.

The real problem will be what is the ultimate orientation of Egypt because it is in many respects the key to the

region breaking it out of the radical camp was what brought about peace with Israel and brought about support for the anti-terrorist

campaign. If they go back to the National Historientation of Naza, then things are going to get very tough.

That Kissinger would equate Nasserism with terrorism is particularly galling to those who are even

passingly familiar with the history of the region.

As is typical with such pronouncements by the mouthpieces of the global elite, the easily

demonstrable truth is precisely the opposite of what Kessinger asserts. He just thinks his

audience is too historically ignorant to call him on his lie. In 1952,

British troops in the Suez Canal Area became embroiled in a fight with local police, resulting in the slaughter of 50 Egyptian policemen and the wounding of 100 more.

The furious Egyptian public long suffering under the reign of King Farruk, a pro-British regent who lived in opulence while his people

struggled, organized into riots, and a cadre of Egyptian army officers calling themselves the

free officers movement overthrew the king and instituted a republic.

They were led by Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein, who became the second president of Egypt in

1956.

From the beginning, Nasser was hated and feared by the international oligarchs who would become used to having a puppet regime in power over the key Suez Canal shipping route.

Nasser was nothing like King Farooq.

...