The patriarchy, the machismo sphere, and misbehaving anons, February 24, 2025.

Introduction. In order to be able to conduct an analysis such as this, I must first review my bona fides with regard to my position within the patriarchy.

I refer to the one that the feminists have so desired to smash.

I do this to prevent some of my adversaries from saying anything silly about my supposed

creeping feminism. I believe everything the Apostle Paul ever wrote about headship and

submission in marriage. I believe this marital relation has ramifications outside of marriage out in broader society,

such that a healthy society is one in which men generally are willing to assume their responsibility

to lead, provide, and protect.

I believe that Christian wedding ceremonies must include the promise to obey in the bride's vows.

I hold that women are more readily deceived than men, always accepting, of course, the stupid men.

I hold that feminism is made up of an odd combination of spiritual rebellion, snarking envy, emotional instability, and mental illness,

none of which is helped or remedied in any way by the pink pussy hats.

Sarah called her husband Lord,

setting an example for Christian women who want to be her daughters. I believe that women should

be excluded from combat roles in the military by law, and I also believe that they should be

excluded by social consensus from combat roles in stupid action movies. You know the kind where

a petite little bit of nothing

who, through her knowledge of the martial arts, and some clever camera work kicks the butts of

half a dozen 200-pound bruisers. I believe the girl boss to be a singularly unattractive figure,

and I also believe the 19th Amendment disenfranchised families and households, thus degrading true

masculine and feminine authority at one go.

There, I think that should do it. If I forgot something, do please write in. So I think it is safe to say

...