THE HASH: SEC's Gensler Warns Crypto Firms to Comply With Rules After Settlement with Kraken
CoinDesk Podcast Network
CoinDesk
4.7 • 698 Ratings
🗓️ 11 February 2023
⏱️ 24 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the hash podcast. |
| 0:10.9 | Stay informed with the latest on Bitcoin, ETH, the Metaverse, Web3, and more, |
| 0:15.9 | with stories that matter to the crypto world, all on the hash for your ears. |
| 0:21.9 | You're listening to the Coin Desk Podcast Network. |
| 0:26.3 | Hey there. Welcome to CoinDest TV. You are watching The Hash. It is a Friday. Happy Friday to you all. |
| 0:33.8 | We wish you well. I'm Zach Seward. That's Jen Sanassie and Adam Levine. We're going to get you caught up |
| 0:38.6 | on today's news, crypto and beyond. Jen, start us off. What do you got? Well, it's not a happy Friday |
| 0:44.6 | for Cracken. So the SEC is warding platforms to take note of Cracken's move to halted staking service |
| 0:51.0 | after paying a $30 million fine to the SEC, we must note that they did not |
| 0:57.1 | admit or deny any allegations on CNBC Squackbox. Gensler said companies like Cracken can offer |
| 1:03.6 | investment contracts but have to have full fair and truthful disclosures. He went on to say |
| 1:09.9 | that they were not a company abiding with basic law. |
| 1:14.3 | Adam, I'm going to kick this one right off to you. After Brian Armstrong's tweet, I didn't expect to |
| 1:20.8 | see an action come down so quickly. It seems like Coinbase CEO Armstrong probably had this |
| 1:26.7 | information in his back pocket. What do you |
| 1:28.9 | make of this? Yeah, lesser rumor and more front-running the announcement that he saw coming. |
| 1:33.4 | So I think that there's a couple of differences from the story that we were talking about yesterday |
| 1:37.2 | that are worth noting. First off, this is not actually an action against staking itself. This is an |
| 1:43.0 | action against companies that are against a company that had a staking itself. This is an action against companies that are against a company that had a |
| 1:47.3 | staking program that allowed you to basically allow them to stake on your behalf. There's still a |
| 1:53.1 | bunch of question marks on my side whether or not that's really a distinction that's particularly |
| 1:57.1 | meaningful in this circumstance, but it is worth noting. So there doesn't appear to be any sort of concern around the actual activity if you're doing it yourself or potentially |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from CoinDesk, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of CoinDesk and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

