Wrestling suit for a mature audience.

I'm done to develop.

Wrestling soup.

I'm Anthony Thomas, joined along with the Kevin Castle.

What is up, man?

So, decent raw.

I know you covered a little bit about it with DT and stuff like that. A couple of significant changes that I'm curious as to your thoughts on. First, I mean, obviously I saw your post about the great Braun Steiner making his winning match and stuff like that. And you pretty much have high hopes for him. I think a lot of us do. But where does he go from here? Like that's one of the questions that I have too. It's like now that he has the IC title, it's almost like the hunt is over, at least in this realm. Does he sit on this belt for a while? Or does he actually just start pushing into the main event? No, I think he sits on this spell for a while with dominance and stuff. Can we keep saying Goldberg and Lesnar? I don't see that at all. It's first of all, Goldberg didn't talk his first fucking year that he was on. You know, Braun Steiner is a, you know, a talking head. He talks a lot, actually. So there's nothing there. Goldberg was a mysterious character who didn't speak at all for almost a year. So, you know, a different size,

different... a lot, actually. So there's nothing there. Goldberg was a mysterious character, who didn't speak at all for almost a year. So, you know, different size, different body type. You know, football players, all they have in common really. And Bronzano can fucking work. So I think the Goldberg comparison is awful because Goldberg can't work. Bronson can work circles. And Brock Lesnar was a collegiate wrestler.

Bronziner has none of that in his background. So again, wrestling fans get on these comparisons that just have no basis of any kind of fact other than it. It's not a bad comparison though. Both of those guys are insanely successful. No, but it's not the same thing. You know, like, you know, just like Kurt Angle, like, you know, when someone comes along because everyone everyone's always got to compare they can't just let someone be unique in their own skin right so there's got to be some comparison sure you know the people have been doing that you know forever in a day that's why when Steve Austin came along like tea I can't figure out who to compare him to a bald white guy redneck who's, you know, has catchphrases.

That's never been done.

He's not like Dick Murdoch.

I mean, who is he like? Right. You know, wrestling fans get on this thing where they, if they don't have a comparison, I think they'll have a meltdown. If they can't do a fucking side by side with somebody. And you can't just say, you know, everybody's not the next anything.

You have to be the next you.

And that's how wrestling survives

as being the next unique product. There's nothing original anyway anymore. But if he, if he's like anything, if he's like anything, it's obvious who he's like. Rick Steiner and Scott Steiner. He's a hybrid of his uncle and his dad.

You know, he's not influenced by people. But do you think they make those comparisons not necessarily based on every etching that makes up a guy like Goldberg or Brock Lesnar, but maybe on the level of success that both of them attained?

Because as much as we love the Steiner's and as great of a career as they had, you look at the heights of guys like Goldberg and Brock Lesnar and they're not compatible.

Do you see what I'm saying?

No, but also, you know, Ron is, you know, Goldberg came into wrestling as a convenience.

He needed something to do when he football was done for him.

Right.

Brock had other aspirations.

...