meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Post Reports

The future of college without affirmative action

Post Reports

The Washington Post

Daily News, Politics, News

4.45.1K Ratings

🗓️ 30 June 2023

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On Thursday, the Supreme Court restricted race-based affirmative action policies, changing the landscape of higher education in the United States. Today, we look at what this decision means for college admissions and beyond. 


Read more:


A decision this summer on the future of affirmative action was one of the most anticipated cases on the Supreme Court’s docket. In a 6-3 decision Thursday, the court overturned decades of precedent by restricting affirmative action policies. They declared that considering race in college admissions violates the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.

 

The decision has sparked outcry and celebration across the nation. We sit down with higher education reporter Nick Anderson to understand how this decision will affect the future of college admissions in the United States.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Well, at the core of this case is the question of how much does race count in decision-making

0:08.2

processes in America?

0:10.4

The court is saying it's time for a new era.

0:14.8

Nick Anderson is a higher education reporter at the post.

0:21.1

He's been reporting on colleges that consider race and admissions.

0:25.7

It's a policy based on decades of affirmative action precedent.

0:30.1

And this week, the Supreme Court rejected that policy.

0:34.3

And we're extremely strictly limiting the place that race and ethnicity have in these specific

0:42.8

high stakes admissions decisions.

0:49.2

These decisions are highly charged.

0:52.0

Right after Thursday's ruling, Yukong Mike Zhao showed up outside the court to celebrate.

1:01.5

All children will no longer be treated as second-class citizens in college admissions.

1:08.0

Zhao is president of the Asian American Coalition for Education, a group that actively supported

1:13.2

the lawsuit against this policy.

1:15.8

The rulings preserve meritocracy, which is the bad rock of the American dream.

1:21.9

Based up to a way, Christopher Banks was furious about the outcome.

1:26.5

This opinion is highly regrettable, highly regrettable.

1:29.9

He's director of education policy at the Urban League of Portland.

1:34.1

And he was outside the court leading a group of high school students on a summer program

1:38.2

in DC.

1:39.2

I myself benefited from Brown, Columbia, and Oxford.

1:43.8

I benefited from an excellent education.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Washington Post, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Washington Post and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.