meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Daily Signal

The Future of Abortion Law

The Daily Signal

The Daily Signal

News, Daily News, Politics, Government

4.81.4K Ratings

🗓️ 23 July 2022

⏱️ 38 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Hadley Arkes, a long-time commentator on abortion, natural law, and constitutional jurisprudence joins the Daily Signal podcast to discuss the arguments that should be made to defend unborn human life in America. He comments that "value judgment, ..., is a term that we began to use with Nietzsche. When people lost their confidence that they could speak about moral truth. So, they could speak about things, [that] have moral significance as we impart value to them. So, the matter of the value judgment is whether some of us, what do we care enough about? How much are we willing to value the life of that offspring in the womb? How much do we value the efforts to offer care for that life?" Arkes points the way to a principled defense of unborn human life that citizens, legislators, and judges can draw upon to instill the principle of equality for the unborn under law in America. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, I'm Richard Reich. Welcome to the Daily Signal Podcast. Today we're talking with

0:10.0

Hadley Arches, an American political scientist, an Edward Nay professor of jurisprudence

0:16.4

and American institutions emeritus at Amherst College, where he has taught since 1966.

0:22.8

He is the founder and director of the James Wilson Institute on natural rights and the

0:28.2

American founding. Hadley, thank you so much for joining us to talk about this recent

0:34.1

DOBS decision and the future of abortion policy and jurisprudence in American law.

0:39.4

Thanks, so good to see you, Richard. Thanks so much for having me out.

0:43.7

So, Hadley, a question here at the beginning. You are a well-known writer, legal, philosophical

0:50.6

commentator on the Constitution and on what you argue for the natural law underpinnings

0:57.0

of the Constitution. You've written extensively about abortion for decades. When the

1:01.8

DOBS decision was handed down on June 24th this past month, what went through your mind?

1:08.7

What about this moment? What did you experience?

1:11.9

Well, it was of course with all any reservations we may have about a great moment. I was active

1:20.5

in this movement just before Rovers' way and it was hard to imagine that this thing

1:27.0

would come down even in our lifetimes. And it took, let's see, 11 Republican appointments

1:33.6

after Rovers' way, finally to get five votes going to do this. But the point at disappointment

1:42.4

was, well, it runs back to those lawyers in Rovers' way, the lawyers from Texas, who

1:50.6

assembled the most elegant brief drawing on the updated findings of embryology woven

1:56.6

with principal reasoning, to make this critical point that that offspring in the womb has

2:03.2

never been anything other than human from its first moments, that it received its nourishment

2:08.6

from this mother, but has never been merely a part of the mother. Well, the dissenters

2:15.2

in Rovers never spoke those words. And the point of disappointment for me and the source

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Daily Signal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Daily Signal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.