meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
We the People

The Federalists vs. the Anti-Federalists

We the People

National Constitution Center

News, News Commentary, History

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 8 August 2019

⏱️ 56 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history–Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen.  Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, and welcome

0:07.6

to We The People, a weekly show of constitutional debate.

0:11.1

The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by Congress

0:15.8

to increase awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people.

0:22.0

In August 1787, the the report. That was the second draft of the Constitution that was circulated.

0:33.7

I know that because in the Constitution Centers, American Treasures Gallery, we have the major

0:39.1

drafts July 24th, August 3rd, September 12th, and September 17th.

0:44.8

And that's as good an occasion as any to talk about the debate between the Federalist and

0:49.8

the Anti-Federalists.

0:51.6

How did their unique constitutional visions influence the drafting and ratification

0:55.4

of the Constitution during those crucial months between May and September 1787, and how should

1:01.9

we interpret the Constitution today in the light of those debates.

1:05.3

Joining us to explore this foundational question between the anti-Federalists and Federalists

1:12.0

are two of America's leading scholars of the Constitution, and

1:16.7

I'm honored to welcome both of them.

1:19.0

Jack Rakoff is the William Robertson Co, Professor of History American studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford.

1:27.0

He is the author of six books including original meanings, politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution which won the Pulitzer Prize in history.

1:35.7

Jack, it is wonderful to have you back with us.

1:38.2

Great to be here.

1:39.8

And Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law.

1:49.8

He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice, and is the author of

1:54.7

Originalism and The Good Constitution, co-written with John McGinnis.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.