The Federalist: The Anti-Federalists
The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast
Hillsdale College
4.6 • 621 Ratings
🗓️ 25 June 2025
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
On this episode of The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast, Jeremiah and Juan discuss the arguments of the Anti-Federalists before introducing Dr. Ronald J. Pestritto.
In a republic, every citizen has a duty to understand their government. The Federalist is the greatest exposition of representative government and the institutional structure of the Constitution. It explains how the Constitution established a government strong enough to secure the rights of citizens and safe enough to wield that power. This course will examine how Publius understood human nature and good government, and why he argued that the only true safeguard of liberty lies in the vigilance of the American people.
The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the Constitution because they feared a large, centralized government. They lost the immediate debate but succeeded in securing a Bill of Rights.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome to the Hillsdale College Online Courses podcast. I'm Jeremiah Regan. |
| 0:13.5 | And I'm Juan Dabellos. We are back with the Federalist Lecture Number 2 today, the anti-federalists. |
| 0:19.5 | In this lecture, Dr. Pastrido talks about the adversaries |
| 0:22.4 | of the ratification of the Constitution, who were given the name anti-federalists by the |
| 0:27.7 | federalists, a clever piece of political maneuvering. And the point that Dr. Pastrido makes in this |
| 0:33.3 | lecture is that the so-called anti-federalists were American patriots. They believed in the principles of the |
| 0:38.6 | Declaration of Independence. Many of them supported the majority of the Constitution, but disputed a few |
| 0:44.9 | provisions. And so as we examine their arguments, we should be thinking about them as true |
| 0:49.5 | American founders who had some arguments against the way the Constitution was structured. We shouldn't |
| 0:55.5 | think of them as the bad guys or losers or anything like that. They helped strengthen the way |
| 1:00.7 | the final constitution looked, including providing the Bill of Rights. American history, we've |
| 1:05.6 | always had strong political differences in the country. And I think to a certain degree that's healthy |
| 1:12.8 | as long as both sides have the same ends in mind right what the federalist it's |
| 1:19.6 | great they get into a definition of a people what makes a people in one of them |
| 1:24.3 | is they have essentially the same definition of justice, and that means that |
| 1:28.9 | they believe that the purpose of government is the same, in their case, to secure the rights |
| 1:34.8 | of citizens and lead them to a happy life. |
| 1:38.4 | And both the federalists and the anti-federalists believe that strongly. They just deferred |
| 1:43.3 | on what's the right way to achieve that end. |
| 1:46.1 | There were questions about means rather than ends. The founders, federalists and anti-federalists, |
| 1:50.8 | would wholeheartedly agree that the purpose of man is to find happiness. And they understood that |
| 1:54.8 | to mean piety, devotion to God, moral excellence, and the normal joy of being satisfied in your |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Hillsdale College, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Hillsdale College and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

