Welcome to another T-Rex talk. Today is a very cold and rainy day in Tennessee. You can probably hear the rain.

But I'm very happy to be working on one of the first days of production since the close of our Black Friday sale.

We had a very good Black Friday sale. And we're very happy to have made a lot of sales and now we get to

make a lot of holsters. So that's going to be a focus for some weeks. And when we catch up,

we'll be able to get our lead times back down to the, you know, the one to five days that we prefer.

But I'm also really happy to be talking about this week's topic, which is the Bruin decision from the Supreme Court.

Now, we've already talked about the Bruin decision in a previous podcast episode.

In fact, if you would like to hear a real lawyer discuss this issue, you should go back and listen to that July 6th episode with Matt from Fuddbusters.

Matt is a real lawyer who works on real firearms cases, so his insight is much more useful and

interesting and accurate than mine is. If you want to hear from a real lawyer, you should

definitely go listen to that episode. It's probably about an hour-long conversation,

if I remember, remember that correctly. But even though I am not a lawyer, I want to revisit

that Bruin decision. Not so much the decision, but the aftermath, the fallout, some of the

fruit that that Bruin decision has borne has borne in the last few months. So the Bruin decision was handed down by the Supreme Court on June 23rd,

and it was authored by the great Justice Clarence Thomas,

who has been involved in a string of wins this year that I appreciate very much.

New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Incorporated versus Bruin. That's why we just call it the Bruin decision.

And it basically struck down the Sullivan Act, this very, very old gun control act that essentially made it almost impossible for New York citizens to get carry permits.

New York State was a May issue state. They weren't

required to issue carry permits. They had a really interesting and oftentimes very corrupt way

of deciding who could actually get carry permits. And that was what was struck down by the

Supreme Court. Because to prevent people from carrying firearms for their own protection, to prevent them from bearing arms, is an infringement on the Second Amendment.

...