meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Edition: Under CTRL, the Epping migrant protests & why is ‘romantasy’ so popular?

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 31 July 2025

⏱️ 39 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

First: the new era of censorship


A year ago, John Power notes, the UK was consumed by race riots precipitated by online rumours about the perpetrator of the Southport atrocity. This summer, there have been protests, but ‘something is different’. With the introduction of the Online Safety Act, ‘the government is exerting far greater control over what can and can’t be viewed online’. While the act ‘promises to protect minors from harmful material’, he argues that it is ‘the most sweeping attempt by any liberal democracy to bring the online world under the control of the state’.


Implemented and defended by the current Labour government, it is actually the result of legislation passed by the Conservatives in 2023 – which Labour did not support at the time, arguing it didn’t go far enough. So how much of a danger is the Act to free speech in Britain?


John joined the podcast to discuss further alongside former Conservative minister Steve Baker, MP from 2010-24, and who was one of the biggest critics of the bill within the Conservative Party at the time.


Next: should we be worried about protests against migrants?


This week, outside a hotel in Epping, groups amassed to protest against the migrants housed there, with counter-protestors appearing in turn. Tommy Robinson might not have appeared in the end, but the Spectator’s Max Jeffrey did, concluding that the protests were ultimately ‘anticlimactic’.


Nevertheless, the protests have sparked debate about the motivations of those speaking out against the migrants – are there legitimate concerns voiced by locals, or are the protests being manipulated by figures on the political fringes? And what do the protests tell us about community tensions in the UK? Max joined the podcast to discuss alongside the editor of Spiked Tom Slater.


And finally: why are ‘romantasy’ novels so popular?


Lara Brown writes in the magazine this week about the phenomenon of the genre ‘romantasy’, which mixes romance with fantasy. While ‘chick-lit’ is nothing new, Lara argues that this is ‘literature taken to its lowest form’, emblematic of the terminally online young people who consume it. Nevertheless, it is incredibly popular and is credited by publishers as boosting the British fiction industry to over £1 billion. To unpack the genre's popularity, Lara joined the podcast, alongside Sarah Maxwell, the founder of London’s first romance-only bookshop Saucy Books, based in Notting Hill.


Hosted by William Moore and Lara Prendergast.


Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Megan McElroy.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to the edition podcast from The Spectator, where each week we shed a little light on the thought process behind putting the world's oldest weekly magazine to bed.

0:17.7

I'm William Moore, the Spectator's Features Editor. And I'm Lara Prendergast, the Spectator's

0:21.7

executive editor. On this week's podcast, is the Online Safety Act already controlling what you can

0:28.0

and can't say online? How worried should we be about the migrant protests and why are

0:33.5

romanticie novels so popular.

0:52.2

First up, how the Online Safety Act is proving to be a disaster for free speech.

0:55.4

John Power writes our cover piece for the magazine this week about the Online Safety Act, which came into force on Friday. The act promised to protect

1:01.8

minors from harmful content such as pornography, self-harm forums and pro-suicide websites.

1:07.7

But as John says, while that sounds good in principle, it represents the most

1:12.2

sweeping attempt by any liberal democracy to bring the online world under the control of the

1:17.3

state. It's been implemented and defended by the current Labour government, but it is actually

1:23.3

the result of legislation passed by the Tories in 2023, which Labour did not support at the time,

1:29.4

arguing it did not go far enough. So how much of a danger is the Act to free speech in Britain

1:34.9

and what can and can't you now say online? To discuss, John joined the podcast alongside the former

1:41.9

Conservative Minister, Steve Baker, who was very much against

1:45.5

the Act. I started by asking John to take us through some of the examples of content that had

1:50.6

been unintentionally censored as a result of the Act coming in on Friday. The effect was almost

1:55.6

immediate as soon as the legislation actually came onto into force last Friday. Several platforms essentially started

2:01.9

limiting access to their content. Reddit is a good example. So the expectation that most

2:07.9

people had that this would most be limited to pornography was proven full somewhat immediately.

2:12.6

R slash beer and R slash cider were not only just not available. There was actually no way of finding the

2:18.1

subreddits on the app itself. On X, the most egregious example was a video recorded of Katie

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.