The Spectator is searching for the UK's brightest entrepreneurs to enter the Spectator Economic Innovator of the Year awards, in partnership with Charles Stanley Wealth managers.

If you have a business that disrupts an existing market, a smart new way of doing things, or something that has incredible social impact, then apply by the 9th of July at spectator.com.combeau.

Hello and welcome to the edition.

Each week we take a look at some of the most important and intriguing issues in the

week's magazine with the writers behind them.

I'm Laura Prendergast.

This week, why has Cambridge taken so much Chinese money?

Plus, will the Church of England's new plans for modernisation

leave us with an institution we even recognise?

And finally, why is streaker's so hilarious?

First up, the spectator's cover story this week

looks into the ever tighter relationship between Cambridge University and China.

To discuss, I'm joined by the author of the piece and Every Breath You Take, a study of China's surveillance date, Ian Williams, and Harry Goodwin, editor-in-chief of the Cambridge student.

In your cover piece this week, you look at how Cambridge has somewhat compromised its integrity

because of its relations with China. When did this start to become a problem?

I think it's been a problem for some time, but more recently it's become more serious.

Cambridge would argue they've always had a very strong relationship with China research relationship and

academic interest in, which is fair enough. But I would date back the recent problems to what we

might call the Cameron Osborne Golden Era. And that was very much like a starting gun, you know,

bang, and everybody goes for the Chinese money.

And it was almost as if any notion of due diligence, any notion of caution was thrown to the wind

when it became official policy to grab Chinese money and Chinese business just as quickly as you could in quantities as large as you could get hold of.

...