4.4 • 785 Ratings
🗓️ 28 April 2022
⏱️ 25 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This podcast is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management, award-winning wealth managers who go |
0:06.2 | above and beyond to support and guide you. Visit can-dowealth.com to start building your wealth with confidence. |
0:18.2 | Hello and welcome to the edition podcast from The Spectator. |
0:23.8 | Every week we take a look at some of the most important and intriguing stories from the issue with the writers behind them. |
0:30.1 | I'm William Moore, the Spectator's Features Editor. |
0:32.7 | And I'm Laura Prendergars, the Spectator's executive editor. |
0:35.9 | This week, is Elon Musk heading for a clash with the British government over free speech? |
0:41.7 | Plus, is it ever okay to stare at someone? |
0:45.2 | And finally, is getting a fringe a cry for help? |
0:49.4 | First up, Elon Musk is buying Twitter. |
0:53.0 | But might the Tesla CEO be in for a battle he wasn't expecting |
0:56.9 | with the British government? Spectator-editor Fraser Nelson writes about this potential clash |
1:02.6 | in this week's issue, and he joins us now. Fraser, in your piece this week, you start by writing |
1:08.6 | about the online safety bill, which is currently |
1:11.4 | going through Parliament, and you call it one of the most ambitious censorship laws that |
1:16.8 | the world has ever seen. Since Elon Musk, who has just bought Twitter, calls himself a free |
1:23.4 | speech fundamentalist, do you see the potential for a future clash between Twitter and the UK government? |
1:30.8 | I think you can see the clash starting already. Only last night, Elon Musk put out a tweet saying |
1:36.9 | that he would refuse to censor anything that wasn't illegal. Now, of course, the whole point of the |
1:42.8 | government's so-called online safety bill is to create a |
1:45.7 | new category of things that intends to censor, things that are legal to say, but are in the government's |
1:51.1 | words, harmful. Now, that, of course, is very controversial. You would certainly argue that I would, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.