Hello and welcome to FentStars.

I'm your host, Bob Mata, and this is our continuing coverage of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Karen Reed.

Today is May 29th, and I am joined once again by my beautiful

brilliant co-host, Allie. What's up, girl?

Hey, babe. Hey, all.

And the Commonwealth has just rested its case.

The government is rested.

The government is rested.

So per usual, my timing with mark federal was

impeccable uh i got him on a perfect day we were going to do this monday and uh i was able to get

to get him for today i had kind of a little bit of a feeling it might it might uh case of

chief might end today so i got lucky with that can't think of a

better guest to have on uh you know him you love him new york power attorney mark bedro welcome my friend

how are you i'm excellent i'm excellent how are you mark see you guys how See you guys. How are you? Good. Good.

So, reeling, still reeling over today.

Yeah. I saw it late today, but I did see it, so I'm ready to go.

So I'm just going to start, I'm sorry, babe, with the last thing which really just got me going. I'm going to ignore her whole comment at first

and just ask you how in the hell the judge allowed in my lawyer said if that was the case,

I'd have some culpability. How is that relevant? It's insane in my mind. I don't get it.

I mean, obviously the clips are admissions, but there still can be hearsay within an admission

that ought to be considered.

There's also a prejudicial versus probative value equation that goes on and to allow evidence that could lead the jury to believe that,

...