meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
We the People

The Dobbs v. Jackson Case – Part 3

We the People

National Constitution Center

News Commentary, News, History

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 12 May 2022

⏱️ 55 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On May 2, Politico published a leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in the pending case Dobbs v. Women’s Health Organization. The draft opinion in Dobbs overrules the precedents Roe v. Wade andPlanned Parenthood v. Casey, which hold that women have the constitutional right to seek pre-viability abortions. In this episode, professors Mary Ziegler of UC Davis Law School and O. Carter Snead of Notre Dame Law School join once again to unpack the constitutional reasoning in Justice Alito’s draft, and the implications for the future of abortion rights in America and the future of Court as an institution in the aftermath of the leaked opinion. Jeffrey Rosen moderates.  Last year, we had two episodes about this case, before and after oral arguments, so be sure to listen to those if you haven’t – available here: Part 1 and Part 2. Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org. Continue today’s conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello friends. I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National

0:06.8

Constitution Center and welcome to We The People, a weekly show of

0:10.4

constitutional debate. The National Constitution Center is a

0:14.6

nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by Congress to increase awareness and

0:19.2

understanding of the Constitution among the American people.

0:23.4

On May 2nd, Politico published a leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito's opinion in Dobbs v Jackson,

0:31.7

women's Health Organization.

0:34.1

Last fall, we convened two of America's leading scholars

0:39.9

of the Constitution and reproductive choice

0:43.5

for a meaningful discussion about Dobbs.

0:46.2

And it's an honor to reconvene them

0:48.8

to discuss Justice Alito's draft opinion and its consequences for the future of the Supreme Court.

0:56.0

Carter Sneeb is professor of law and director of the Danicola Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame Law School.

1:03.0

Carter, it is an honor to have you back.

1:05.0

Great to be with you, thanks.

1:07.0

And Mary Zeppelin is a professor at UC Davis

1:10.0

and author of Abortion and the Law in America a legal history rovy way to the present.

1:16.0

Mary, it's an honor to have you back as well.

1:19.0

Thanks for having me.

1:20.0

Carter, what was your reaction to the constitutional reasoning of Justice Alito's draft opinion?

1:28.0

Yeah, so I mean I was distraught by the fact of the leak but as to the merits of the the draft opinion

1:36.7

I think it wasn't all that surprising to be honest I think when last we met

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.