meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

The Disillusion of Millennial Evangelicals

Breakpoint

Colson Center

News, Religion & Spirituality, News Commentary, Christianity

4.82.8K Ratings

🗓️ 2 September 2021

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Though Gen Z-ers have all but replaced Millennials as the dazzling object of scrutiny and cultural analysis, it's not because Millennials are no longer struggling. Rates of addiction, depression, burnout, and loneliness are all disproportionately high among the demographic born between 1981 and 1996. Since 2013, in fact, Millennials have seen a 47 percent increase in major depression diagnoses.

For their part, evangelical Millennials are in a season of deconstruction and deconversion, or reeling from the many influential and high profile leaders that have recently either left the faith or fallen from grace. Disillusionment is now a dominant feature of this group that was once convinced it could change the world.

In his influential book The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt uses a rider and an elephant to illustrate moral psychology. The rider represents intellectual reasoning. The elephant represents immediate perceptions, intuitions and instincts. Most modern people, Haidt argues, think that their own moral frameworks are derived from objective, rational reasoning. In other words, it's the rider who tells the elephant where to go and what to eat. In reality, however, moral decisions primarily come from our gut instincts, and we use intellectual reasoning to justify those decisions. Or, back to our metaphor, the elephant wants bananas, and the rider explains why bananas are good after the decision to get bananas has already been made. 

If Haidt is right, we can better understand the beauty and power of Christianity. To borrow his metaphor, Christ speaks to both the rider and the elephant. "Like newborn babies," the Apostle Peter tells us, "crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good." Christianity is not only ultimately true, it is also ultimately satisfying. It is satisfying, in fact, because it is true.

This provides a helpful lens by which to understand Millennial deconstruction, deconversion, and disillusionment. What if a generation of Christians have been taught to crave the wrong thing? 

Recently, my friend Sean McDowell described a conversation he had with a deconverted evangelical. He was surprised to learn that this skeptic first started to doubt his faith at a Coldplay concert. Though there are plenty of anti-Christian bands, Coldplay isn't one of them. 

The lead singer didn't challenge anyone's faith or any particular truth claims from the stage. However, the concert produced in the skeptic so many of the feelings he had always associated with worship. The stadium of people singing in unison, the strong emotion elicited by lyrics and melody, and the unifying cultural grandeur of it all felt a lot like, well, church

But then, what had this former believer been experiencing all those years? It suddenly seemed possible that Christianity was just another man-made phenomenon, enjoyable and moving but not really true.  You know, like a Coldplay concert. 

What if we are seeing the fruit of a generation that was sold endless attempts to make Christ cool and likable, worship relevant and hyper-emotional, and Christian morality more about politics and cultural influence than obedience to God? And what if this generation has now found those experiences elsewhere? What if all of the trendy marketing, political capital, and massive concert experiences inadvertently taught a generation to love the glamour and the feelings, but not Christ? 

If there's any truth to this analysis, there is also consolation. Many Millennials are discovering that there are no better answers "out there," either. Yet, like all human beings, they still crave the truth, depth, and beauty found only in the Gospel. 

Chuck Colson kept a plaque on his desk that read: "Faithfulness, not success." Having climbed the heights of worldly success, he knew that nothing in this life could ultimately satisfy. Forced to reckon with how empty it all was, he encountered Jesus. As he wrote in Loving God

God doesn't want our success; He wants us. He doesn't demand our achievements; He demands our obedience. The kingdom of God is a kingdom of paradox, where through the ugly defeat of a cross, a holy God is utterly glorified. Victory comes through defeat; healing through brokenness; finding self through losing self.

Culture - even Christian culture - comes and goes. The eternal truths of Christ are forever. And they are enough to satisfy a drifting generation.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What if the church already has what a lost generation needs?

0:04.0

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street.

0:06.2

This is Breakpoint.

0:10.9

Though Gen Zers have all but replaced millennials as the dazzling object of all scrutiny and cultural analysis,

0:17.2

it's not because millennials are no longer struggling.

0:20.7

Rates of addiction, depression,

0:21.9

burnout, loneliness, these are all disproportionately high among the demographic born between

0:26.7

1981 and 1996. Since 2013, in fact, millennials have seen a 47% increase in major depression

0:35.5

diagnoses. And for their part, evangelical millennials are in a season

0:40.3

of deconstruction and deconversion, reeling from many of the influential and high-profile leaders

0:45.6

that have recently either left the faith or fallen from grace. Disillusionment is now a dominant

0:51.3

feature of evangelical millennials, a group once convinced that it could change the world.

0:55.9

In his influential book, The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt, uses a writer and an elephant in order to illustrate moral psychology.

1:03.7

Here's how it goes. The writer represents intellectual reasoning. The elephant, immediate perceptions, intuitions, and instincts. Now, most modern people

1:12.9

are convinced, argues hate, that their own moral frameworks are derived from objective,

1:18.2

rational reasoning. In other words, it's the writer who tells the elephant where to go, what to

1:22.8

eat. In reality, however, our moral decisions primarily come from our gut instincts, and we use our

1:29.3

intellectual reasoning in order to justify those decisions. Or back to our metaphor, the elephant

1:35.5

wants bananas. The writer then explains why bananas are good after the decision to get bananas

1:41.0

is already made by the elephant. If hate is right, we can better understand

1:45.1

the beauty and power of Christianity. To borrow his metaphor, Christ speaks to both the writer

1:50.4

and to the elephant. Like newborn babes, said the apostle Peter, crave pure spiritual milk,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.