Content warning, this episode contains discussion of the murder of two girls as well as a suicide.

If you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or ideation, please contact the National Hotline at 988.

So we're recording on November 27th, 2023, and that of course is a date we've been anticipating for a while because as we

all know earlier the former defense team of Richard Allen with their own attorneys have

filed a couple of writs in the Indiana Supreme Court.

More importantly, they filed one writ which said,

we want Brad Rosie and Andrew Baldwin to come back on the case

is Richard Allen's defense attorneys.

We want Judge Gold to be removed as the judge in the case, and finally we want a trial to be granted within 70 days.

The significance of the November 27th date is that was the date by which Judge Gull had a deadline to respond to these arguments.

And so we have her response today.

And in addition to that, the Attorney General's office

is also filed a response to what the defense has put out there.

So we're going to discuss all of that today.

And before we do right at the top of the episode,

I want to stress that both of these filings obviously come

essentially from the state's point of view or the prosecution's point of view or

judge goals point of view or the prosecution's point of view or Judge Gold's point of view if you will.

And so that means the arguments we're going to be discussing today will be from that point of view.

And just keep in mind that's only one part of it all.

Earlier, when we cover the original filings, we presented the defenses point of view.

And now we're presenting the prosecution's point of view.

...