meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Dangers of Judicial Supremacy

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 17 November 2023

⏱️ 55 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With GC out, Jack Fitzhenry once again joins Zack to dive into what's happening at SCOTUS. They discuss the new cases the Court has agreed to hear, the Rahimi oral argument, and NCAA/sports-related SCOTUS trivia.


Zack then interviews Yonatan Green about the proposed reforms to Israel's judicial system and how those differ from the so-called reforms being proposed here in the United States.


You can read what Zack has written on the issue here: https://lawliberty.org/the-challenges-of-judicial-restraint/


And you can read Yonatan's paper here: https://fedsoc.org/fedsoc-review/the-peculiar-case-of-the-israeli-legal-system


Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:05.2

I'm John Carl O'Connorparo.

0:07.1

I'm Zach Smith.

0:08.2

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:20.4

Welcome back to another episode of SCOTUS 101.

0:23.6

GC is out again this week, so we're pleased to be joined once again by Jack Fitzhenry.

0:28.2

Jack, how are you doing?

0:29.5

Not bad.

0:30.1

Thanks for having me back.

0:31.1

So who did you make angry to get pressed into this duty again?

0:36.3

I'm under an obligation not to disclose.

0:39.2

Oh, always invoke your Fifth Amendment right.

0:41.1

A smart man and a great lawyer, I can tell.

0:44.4

Legally trained here.

0:45.6

Well, we're glad to have you with us today.

0:48.0

Let's jump right into it.

0:49.4

There have actually been a flurry of orders since our last episode, and the court granted

0:53.4

review in four cases.

0:55.6

The justices agreed to hear Garland v. Cargill, which is a challenge to the ATF's infamous

1:00.4

bumpstock ban. A bumpstock, of course, is an attachment that can essentially transform

1:05.4

a semi-automatic firearm into a fully automatic one. The court also agreed to hear another gun-related case with

1:12.7

NRA versus Volo, where the court is being asked to decide whether Maria Vullos, who is the then

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.