Knowing what little time we have and how quickly this can spiral out of control, we still have a lot of questions.

For instance, was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning?

And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity

of this, how complex it could actually get, and further possibilities of casualties or other damage,

the difficulty of dealing with these people? Or was he told this would be relatively quick in and out?

Or is it will live forever.

Was he Donald Trump able to take it all in?

Laura Ingraham wants to know the answer to that question.

Hi again, everybody.

It's now 5 o'clock in New York.

It's quite convenient.

Apparently Donald Trump is never wrong, but when he is wrong,

when he gets something wrong, as the MAGA newscasters are starting to worry maybe he has,

it must be someone else's fault, right? Maybe he wasn't briefed. So he can't fail. He can only be

failed or incapable of, quote, what'd she say?

Taking it in.

This isn't the first time the American people have been on the receiving end of the,

he got bad advice or bad briefing that he, quote, couldn't take in story where Trump screw up.

We heard precisely the same narrative from his allies

on tariffs, which he's always loved, an immigration, which he's always pumped the adrenal glands

of, on Greenland, which he's always been obsessed with, and on the Fed, on judicial nominations,

and on and on. But this particular iteration about whether or not he could, quote, take it in on Iran is

...