I have been listening to people.

Pylon on this issue of January 6th and whether the vice president of the United States

Mike Pence had the authority to reject or to send back to various states.

There are electric counts. The snideness, the, um, suffigrant diesment of those who insist

he had no authority whatsoever, from former federal prosecutors to reprobates with a computer.

It is really quite remarkable. And so I want to circle back on this question because they

are 100% certain he did not. I'm not advocating anything. I'm not a special pleader for anything.

But we're going to look at this and we're going to look at it without the blinding hate for

Trump at National Review with a Wall Street Journal or these other places. I think for myself,

I study these things myself, the Constitution, the Federalist papers, Madison's notes,

the state conventions, all that I've studied my entire life say nothing about this topic,

zero. So they point to a statute they was passed that 150 years ago by Congress that lays

out a process that is to take place as their authority. Well, I look at the Constitution

as my authority. But before we get there, I have a question for you. It all makes sense

when I'm done. So you got to stay the whole hour. Is the phrase judicial review anywhere

in the United States Constitution? Anywhere? Under Article 3? When the framers wrote

Article 3 and said very little about the court they created the Supreme Court other than

in the Federalist papers, Hamilton said it would be the least dangerous of the branches

of government. With a promoting this idea of judicial review that the court would have

the final say on the interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, where

is that in the Constitution, Mr. Producer? Nowhere. It is an implied power. And if you defy

a court and you've heard me say it, you can be held in contempt of court. The court

...