The Case of the Missing Constitutional Violation
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
Slate Audio
4.6 • 3.4K Ratings
🗓️ 26 January 2016
⏱️ 28 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Amicus is sponsored by Casper, an online retailer of premium mattresses for a fraction of the price. |
| 0:05.7 | Casper mattresses come with free delivery and returns within a 100-day period, |
| 0:10.0 | and get $50 toward any mattress purchase by visiting Casper.com slash Amicus |
| 0:15.5 | and using the promo code Amicus. |
| 0:18.4 | Hi and welcome to Amicus Slate Supreme Court Podcast. |
| 0:25.1 | I am Dahlia Lithwick and I cover the High Court for Slate magazine. |
| 0:31.0 | So we're coming at you a few days late this week and for that we blame the snow. |
| 0:36.0 | Here in Virginia now we're mostly dug out, dusted off, and ready to act like serious thinkers |
| 0:42.0 | rather than just mindless consumers of marshmallows and hot liquid chocolate. |
| 0:47.0 | Now this week we decided to focus on a deeply strange, the word bizarre was invoked |
| 0:52.0 | more than once at oral arguments last Tuesday. |
| 0:55.0 | Case involving speech and public employees. |
| 0:58.0 | It's almost creeping up on an encyclopedia Brown mystery, the case of the missing constitutional violation. |
| 1:05.0 | So the case is called Heffernin versus City of Patterson, and it involves a 20-year veteran police officer |
| 1:12.0 | of the Patterson New Jersey Police Department who was demoted in 2006 for ostensibly supporting the wrong mayoral candidate |
| 1:20.0 | except he never supported that candidate or any candidate in the first place. |
| 1:25.0 | It turns out he was just picking up a yard sign for the wrong candidate for his bedridden mother. |
| 1:31.0 | Mistake in identity, comedy ensues, confusion. |
| 1:35.0 | The first amendment question at the heart of Heffernin versus Patterson is this. |
| 1:40.0 | When you are a public employee, do you have a right not to be retaliated against |
| 1:46.0 | when the city falsely ascribes a political viewpoint to you that you never even had? |
| 1:51.0 | I know, right? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Audio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Audio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

