meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: Jane Ridley on George V

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 27 October 2021

⏱️ 36 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week’s Book Club podcast, Sam Leith's guest is the historian Jane Ridley, talking about her new book George V: Never A Dull Moment. She tells him there’s so much more to the 'boring' monarch than shooting grouse and collecting stamps. Hear how he navigated some of the worst constitutional crises in memory, saved the British monarchy as the grand dynasties of Europe started toppling… and then inadvertently imperilled it again by his treatment of his son and heir.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority. Absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

0:27.8

Hello and welcome to The Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor of The Spectator.

0:33.8

And this week my guest is Jane Ridley. James's new book is a new biography of George V,

0:40.2

subtitled Never a Dull Moment.

0:42.7

And as somebody's just read it, I can attest to that.

0:46.1

But notoriously, that subtitle takes on the great charge against George,

0:51.9

which is that he was as boring as hell. Jane, why has he got

0:57.3

this reputation as being as boring as he was? Well, Sam, good morning. I think that is a very

1:03.1

good question. I think that he was very sort of discreet and he kept his diary, which is the sort of,

1:09.8

you know, it's the sort of the most boring kind of diary

1:13.2

that you can imagine. It just says what time he got up, what the weather's like, what he had

1:17.3

what time he had lunch, who he met through the day. It's all sort of fact, and there's no

1:21.7

reflection at all. That sort of evidence, I think, has caused people to think, you know,

1:26.6

that he was a good man, but a dull man. And that was the sort of evidence, I think, has caused people to think, you know, that he was a good man, but a dull man.

1:29.3

And that was the sort of idea that I had when I began the book. And people would say rather pityingly to me,

1:35.1

you know, how on earth are you going to cope with the dullness? But the more I got into it,

1:39.6

and I spent an awful long time on it, the more I felt that George really wasn't dull, and certainly that,

1:44.9

you know, the times that he was living through were not at all dull, the opposite, tumultuous,

1:49.5

you know, life-changing. And equally, I found his marriage very interesting.

1:55.1

Well, as you say, you know, you do concede that wading through these diaries, which are extremely factual, and you quote from often to kind of, well, the sort of devastating, you know, you do concede that wading through these diaries, which are extremely factual.

2:01.6

And you quote from them often to kind of, like, sort of devastating effect.

2:05.9

You know, he'll sort of say, you know, ex, somebody very close to him, you know, died.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.