Dan Bangeino.

Welcome to the Bangeino brief. I'm Dan Bangeino.

I've never seen it better explained than the two big tenets of critical theory

and critical race theory. Better than this one example is one piece. It's in the hill. Jonathan

Terley, the rise of a generation of censors, law schools are the latest battleman, law schools,

the latest battleman over free speech. Folks, this is serious. The article is a serious article

that highlights a very serious problem. But within the piece is a paragraph that perfectly encapsulates

two tenets of critical theory and critical race theory. You need to understand and the why.

Why liberals are doing this? The gist of the piece is this that law schools now are censoring

any opposing thoughts when it comes to topics. They deem controversial, controversial,

excuse me, like transgender rights, whatever it may be. Law schools now are banning or outright

censoring any opposition. Well, folks, what's the problem with that?

Well, ladies and gentlemen, where do you think our judges and lawyers come from?

Law schools, you're going to have a generation of judges who are never going to see the pro-life

arguments, never going to see the pro-second amendment arguments, never going to see the religious

liberty arguments when it comes to transgender rights or whatever it may be. They're never going

to see any of that. They're only going to get one side. And when you only get one side, there only

is one side. But that's not the way courts work. There's a defendant and a plaintiff.

Courts are two-sided. They're adversarial by nature. That's why they're courts.

We're going to have an entire generation of lawyers who have no legal knowledge, what's so ever

about issues that matter to conservatives, religious liberty, the second amendment, freedom,

all of it. So Duke was going to have a debate, a symposium about transgender rights and activism

...