Hello there, you Awakening Wonder. Thanks for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

Well done for transcending the fear. Well done for avoiding the legacy media's attempts to fill you full of information that is not beneficial to your spiritual advancement.

Remember, we premiere every day, 12 Eastern Time.

Become an awakened wonder to get access to more content from us.

Meditations, five ideas that will change the world, meaningful ideas, successful communities that have broken out of this system.

Deep spiritual readings, new ideas and arcane wisdom fused together. Individual awakening, community reformation and even revolution. That's what we're going to be discussing. And we've got a guest that

could join us in those spaces easily. David Zweig is a journalist for silentlunch.net. He's the

author of Invisible's and Abundance of Caution. He's one of the

Twitter files journalists who helped lift the lid on the suppression of information that was

taking place during the pandemic and the deep state intervention in public discourse that's come

to define our age. He's a fantastic journalist. David, thank you so much for joining us.

Thanks for having me. This is a conversation or a subject subject at least, that we discuss continually on our channel.

We talk a lot about studies that reveal that during the pandemic period, the information

we were given was biased and it's extraordinary how the biases often have a common trajectory. It seems that

many of the narratives on masks, lockdowns and other COVID measures were ineffective to the

point of being misleading and potentially dishonest. Can you tell us a bit about this, David?

Sure. Yeah, it's a broad topic. But specifically what I had written about

not that long ago was a study that was published out of Imperial College of London, where they did

something called a challenge study, which is they purposefully infected participants in the study

with SARS-CoB-2 to give them COVID, and then they studied them.

And these types of studies have certain ethical issues regarding them, because you're

purposely infecting the participants, but they got approval for it. These were low-risk people.

...