A couple days ago, a pseudonymous account put out a proposal that says,

Spammers have all this Bitcoin, and we're going to burn that Bitcoin so that spam becomes untenable.

There seem to be people who seriously consider seizing users Bitcoin, even if it is the dirty

spammers and gamblers.

Do they enjoy the same access to Bitcoin as the rest of us, high and mighty pure Bitcoiners?

It's almost like a reverse Jubilee.

So instead of everybody like their deaths being wiped away, we're going to seize everything.

I think they have a name for that, actually.

I think it's 1601, 1640, whatever that thing, Roosevelt.

Yeah.

It's basically like that, but for your ordnals.

Mr. President, a second filter has hit the timeline.

That's right.

They're still trying to filter your Bitcoin transactions. A new

proposal suggesting we burn users Bitcoin. And guess what? It is the worst proposal I've ever heard.

We're going to explain it.

A couple days ago, a pseudonymous account named Claire Ostrom, spelled Claire like the name, O-S-T-R-O-M,

Oström, put out a proposal called the cat, not to be confused with Op-Cat, but actually like the cat,

like an actual animal who is a cat.

That says, spammers have all this Bitcoin and we're going to burn that Bitcoin so that spam becomes untenable.

This proposal was denied from the Bitcoin developer mailing list, spicy we'll talk about in a sec, and then the proposal also kind of ham-fistedly tries to impose a cost onto the

spammers. Now, I'll explain how that doesn't really seem to be very effective.

...