meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Lawfare Podcast

The Biden Administration’s New Policy on Drone Strikes

The Lawfare Podcast

The Lawfare Institute

Law, Terrorism, History, Politics, News, National Security, Foreign Policy, Intelligence, Diplomacy, International Law, International Relations, Constitutional Law, Rule Of Law, Current Events, Government, Military

4.76.4K Ratings

🗓️ 21 October 2022

⏱️ 63 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Recently, Charlie Savage of the New York Times reported that the Biden administration had finalized a new policy governing drone strikes used in counterterrorism operations outside war zones. The policy tightens up rules established under the Trump administration—which themselves replaced an earlier guidance set out by President Obama. President Biden’s policy is the latest effort to calibrate America’s use of force in a 21st-century conflict outside the traditional battlefield.

To talk through Charlie’s reporting, Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic sat down with him and Lawfare cofounder Bobby Chesney, who has closely observed this area of U.S. law and policy. They discussed how U.S. counterterrorism operations have changed in recent years, how Biden’s approach compares to the Obama and Trump policies before it, and the significance of these changes for U.S. counterterrorism going forward. 

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The following podcast contains advertising.

0:04.0

To access an ad-free version of the LawFair podcast,

0:08.0

become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash law fair.

0:14.0

That's patreon.com slash law fair.

0:18.0

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings,

0:22.0

rational security, chatter, law fair no bull, and the aftermath.

0:29.0

The Obama administration was at pains to try to establish that with the policy guidance,

0:40.0

there wasn't really much of a gap between our law of armed conflict model

0:44.0

and their international human rights law model.

0:47.0

In one place where that would seem to be hard to establish,

0:50.0

would be with respect to whether or not you're allowed to use force

0:53.0

when the target is not on the verge of attacking someone,

0:57.0

and the human rights law model, you need that strict temporal immanence.

1:01.0

The use of the policy language containing the immanent threat

1:05.0

makes it sound like that window has been closed,

1:08.0

but as I explained the definition in actual practice,

1:11.0

there really is still quite a gap there.

1:14.0

I'm Quintedrassic, a senior editor at LawFair,

1:17.0

and this is the LawFair podcast, October 21st, 2022.

1:23.0

Recently, Charlie Savage of the New York Times reported that the Biden administration

1:28.0

had finalized a new policy governing drone strikes,

1:31.0

used in counterterrorism operations outside of war zones.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Lawfare Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Lawfare Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.