I'm strong and get it you're listening to the best the Armstrong and get it sure

was on the panel in the Senate I'm not even sure what panel it was but he was talking to

professor and who studies tech and searches and how it influences opinion votes and it's interesting

Ted is adopted or is moved back into a much more reasonable curious likable guy thing

he went with like bomb chucking in obnoxious for a while he was running for president

yeah or I think he that's off the table now I wonder if the bethose thing humbled him a little bit too

where you're senator you win you got six years you don't have to you don't have to be in the

bomb chucking game yeah yeah Donald Trump may be a rat but I have no desire to copulate with

uh good good times in a brilliant line but anyway here he is so we have the name of this professor

I'd left the the fact sheet I had in in the office like an idiot but we'll get it for you

but let's listen in for a minute same approach at google um dr. epstein I found your testimony

incredibly powerful and incredibly concerning and and if anyone draws news out of this hearing I

would encourage you to review very carefully dr. epstein's testimony and I'd like to take a moment

to make clear several things first of all as I understand your background uh you're not a

republican and and nor are you a conservative is that accurate that would be an understatement

and and indeed you're the former editor-in-chief of psychology today correct so your respected academic

you testified before this committee that google's manipulation of votes

gave at least 2.6 million additional votes to Hillary Clinton in the year 2016 is that correct

that's correct yeah we got to stop okay let everybody let that sink in everybody yeah

do you realize what you just heard what does he mean by manipulation of what number will he

he'll get more but we do hear that number yeah 2.6 million wow okay what's correct

and I want to make sure I understand you personally supported and voted for Hillary Clinton

...