meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Atheist Experience

The Atheist Experience 29.25 with Jmike and Seth Andrews @TheThinkingAtheist (With Special Guest Godless Engineer)

The Atheist Experience

The Atheist Community of Austin

Religion & Spirituality, Non-profit, Business

4.62.5K Ratings

🗓️ 23 June 2025

⏱️ 116 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Welcome to The Atheist Experience 29.25 with Jmike and Seth Andrews @TheThinkingAtheist and Special Guest, Godless Engineer! This week, your hosts dive into some thought-provoking discussions about morality, belief, and the challenges of open dialogue.

This episode kicks off with a powerful monologue about the very nature of good and evil, challenging the idea that everything, even atrocities, could be justified as part of a "greater good" or a consequence of free will. The segment questions the coherence of concepts like sin and atonement if all events are ultimately part of a divine plan. Guest host Seth Andrews then shares insights into his background and experience, including a look back at his past as a Christian radio broadcaster. He also reflects on the importance of extending grace to those with differing beliefs, advocating against demeaning or superior attitudes towards religious individuals.

Drew from California calls in to discuss the challenges of managing temper and emotions when engaging with people who hold opposing views. The conversation explores a specific incident where a friend, despite knowing Drew's skeptical stance, sent him astrology content, leading to a breakdown in communication and a feeling of disrespect. The hosts and caller delve into the dynamics of setting and respecting personal boundaries in conversations about deeply held beliefs.

Jim from Missouri raises questions about the resurrection story, presenting arguments that it is a complete fabrication. He challenges the traditional biblical narrative of Jesus's burial, positing that crucified individuals were typically left unburied or thrown into mass graves, rather than being placed in tombs. The discussion extends to the broader lack of contemporary historical evidence for Jesus's existence and the reliability of biblical accounts when proving biblical claims.

A theist caller, Shabbaz, asks where atheists get their morals and why they often seem disrespectful or condescending. Seth answers the first part by explaining evolved ethics and pro-social behaviors as a basis for morality. The conversation then delves into Shabbaz's reasons for believing in Allah, including a "falsification test" from the Quran and supposed "scientific miracles" related to bees and honey. The hosts challenge these claims, questioning the criteria for such tests and highlighting historical knowledge that predates the Quran regarding honey and bee behavior. The discussion also unpacks why some atheists might express frustration or disrespect in such conversations, often stemming from repeated, vague arguments.

Finally, John from New Hampshire calls in to discuss the historical existence of Jesus, prompting a nuanced conversation about what kind of evidence is sought for such claims. The hosts and caller explore the idea of a "minimal historical Jesus" and the challenges of relying on common names or biblical accounts for historical proof. The call culminates with the hosts sharing their own "pause moments" – instances where their beliefs were genuinely challenged, leading to deeper inquiry and a strengthening of their skeptical positions, including Jmike's pivotal experience with Flat Earth theory.

Thank you for watching and listening to The Atheist Experience!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-atheist-experience--3254896/support.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Suppose for a moment that we live in a world where superheroes exist.

0:04.0

And imagine one flying throughout the city, checking for evil when they come across someone harming an innocent person.

0:11.0

What could we expect from such a being?

0:13.0

One who possesses the ability to stop the evil, has the motivation and aims to stop the evil wherever necessary,

0:19.0

and knows that the evil will occur? We'd obviously expect them to stop the event from happening.

0:24.6

But what if they didn't?

0:26.6

What could we say then about such a being?

0:28.6

What if in response they just sit there, let it occur,

0:32.6

and claim that the free will of the evil-doer was a greater good than preventing the harm,

0:38.1

or worse, that the evil action itself leads to some greater good down the line.

0:43.9

Could we call that being good? Would there even be any coherent sense of evil from their

0:49.1

perspective? I mean, imagine if I came up to you, punched you, stole your wallet, and when confronted, I simply said, it was for the greater good.

0:57.6

If it turns out that there is no evil all things considered, then what exactly even is sin?

1:04.8

Something that should occur after all?

1:08.0

If that's the case, then original sin should have occurred. It's not something that

1:12.1

shouldn't have occurred. And if that follows, then Jesus' atonement seems utterly meaningless

1:17.9

because he didn't die for anything that shouldn't have occurred in the first place.

1:22.0

So I guess my point is this. If we can't expect such a being to stop evil because of free will or some greater good excuse,

1:30.3

then the entire notion of goodness and the theology that follows from it can virtually justify anything.

1:37.4

And if you disagree with me, call the show because it's starting now.

1:47.3

Welcome, everybody.

1:48.6

Today is June 22nd, 2025.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 21 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Atheist Community of Austin, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Atheist Community of Austin and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.