The home of common sense. This is talk.

With me in the studio, an old friend of mine, political commentator and broadcaster,

Chloe Dobbs. Good morning, Chloe.

Morning.

The bottom line is that we locked down. We had mask tyranny and vaccine tyranny.

And what it's done, and the COVID inquiry costs 200 million.

What they haven't ascertained and pointed out is that it's destroyed the country.

No, the whole focus has been on why didn't you lock down sooner and harder to save all of these lives?

They had to fight to get any consideration of the impact of children in the inquiry.

When they initially launched it, they were refusing

to even look at the impact on young people, which was insane, because this is one of the most

devastating impacts that's come out of the inquiry. They now have, they did eventually, after

a lot of campaigning, being forced, they were forced to do so, and that is on one of the front

pages. I'm glad that that has been locked at. But I'm quite surprised

from the front pages how welcoming a lot of them are of this judgment saying, oh, they're just

saying lockdown wasn't necessary at all. That's not really what they're saying. No, it's a misleading

headline, isn't it? It is misleading. And although it says, oh, if you had lockdown sooner and harder or taken really

strict measures initially, you would have never needed lockdown. What they're kind of essentially

trying to say there is if you had taken really strict measures with, for example, social distancing,

that was in there in the report. And I'm thinking, hang on, I thought we proved that standing two

meters apart doesn't really do anything.

All of that. Remember all the stickers in the shops and everything where you had to stand two meters apart, even when you were outside?

...