The views expressed in the following episode are those of the subjects interviewed, or individual

presenters from the case. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Retriex LLC, the Invisible

Choir Podcast, or Cast Media.

Invisible Choir explores detailed depictions of violence and murder, and is not appropriate

for all audiences. Listener discretion is advised.

They put people into two categories, polite, decent civilizement of the fuckers and violent

people, and I don't think that's nuanced enough. I think there's a person who is violent

but is actually honorable and decent. That is that archetype that I'm interested in.

Here on Invisible Choir, we've covered all sorts of cases. Each nook and cranny of the extensive

realm that is true crime has been thoroughly dissected, analyzed, and digested right here

on this podcast. You think we'd eventually get sick of it, but we never do. Our intrigue

and desire to understand the human psyche through criminality never yields nor ceases to

amaze us. With that being said, a lot of the crimes we cover differ wildly from one to

the next, but some do share great similarities, such as the all-predictable motive of love

or money. But another type of case that reappears from time to time in our research is the theme

of the echo chamber. The online rabbit holes or dangerous digital caves people sometimes find

themselves stuck in. Oftentimes these involve alarming ideologies from a central figure or figures,

which in turn fuel thousands or millions of fans or followers online. Here individuals will

validate each other's misconstrued realities, thus making these ideas or philosophies seem a

lot less absurd or atypical. To them at least. Art, film, books, and music are the simplest forms

of joy in most of our lives, but in the rare occurrence where the creator of said media is one

with a propensity for extreme violence. The fandom that may inevitably follow can be downright

...