You are listening to the Jordan is My Loyer podcast, your favorite source of

unbiased news and legal analysis. Enjoy the show. The show. Welcome back to the Jordan is my lawyer podcast.

Happy Tuesday. This episode we're really going to focus on two main stories.

Both are lawsuits. One is in front of the Supreme Court. The other is a recently filed lawsuit out of Texas.

I asked you on Instagram which stories you were most interested in.

These were the two stories that I found most people wanted to hear about.

So we'll talk about those in depth and then I'll have

some quick hitters for you. The quick hitters include a presidential election update.

Trump's immunity claims being denied, a former United States ambassador who was just

arrested for acting as an agent of Cuba and then the White House saying it's

running out of money for Ukraine. Those would be today's stories. Before we get into them, let me just

give you the reminder I give you every episode, which is, if you haven't left me a

review yet and you like what you hear today, please go ahead and do that. If you have left me a review, thank you so much. It truly is so appreciated.

As my legal disclaimer, yes I am a lawyer. No, I am not your lawyer. Without further ado,

let's get into today's stories. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case called Harrington versus Purdue

Pharma yesterday. Why is this case important? There's a few reasons. The first reason is because this is one of the most high-profile bankruptcy cases in recent past. A law professor at the University of Chicago called this the biggest bankruptcy case to go to the Supreme Court in 30 or 40 years.

The second reason this matters is because it'll determine whether the Sackler family who owns Purdue

Pharma and controlled Purdue Pharma for a very long time

can be held civilly liable for its role in the opioid epidemic and the third reason this case is important is because it'll

answer a more broad question of whether bankruptcy law allows a court to

approve a bankruptcy plan that essentially gets rid of claims brought by third parties without their

consent. So let's get into this. It'll make more sense as we dive into a bit more detail per usual.

...