Texas Fights the Feds, Again
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
The Heritage Foundation
4.5 • 527 Ratings
🗓️ 2 December 2022
⏱️ 45 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This week your hosts go to lengths to explain why the apparently esoteric cases argued this week are, in fact, much more interesting than they sound. Meanwhile, Texas is back at the Court fighting the feds, something Texas S.G. Judd Stone has a lot of experience doing. Zack discusses that oral argument and then interviews former Congressman, Senator, Governor, and Ambassador Sam Brownback. For trivia this week, GC relies on the always excellent work of Dr. Adam Feldman to quiz Zack about Justice Jackson's early oral argument performance.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court. |
| 0:05.3 | I'm John Carlo Canoparo. |
| 0:07.3 | I'm Zach Smith. |
| 0:08.5 | And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, |
| 0:13.4 | what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government. |
| 0:20.7 | Welcome back to SCOTUS 101. G.C., we've only... related to our favorite branch of government. |
| 0:23.0 | Welcome back to SCOTUS 101. |
| 0:27.5 | G.C., we've only got a few weeks to go before the court's winter recess. |
| 0:29.5 | So what has the court been up to? |
| 0:32.8 | Well, there are a couple of orders to note from last week. |
| 0:40.7 | First, the court dismissed Brooks v. Abbott, a 14th Amendment challenge to Texas's redistricting plan for lack of jurisdiction. |
| 0:46.3 | Now, this is one of those rare cases where the court has mandatory appellate jurisdiction. |
| 0:49.8 | So what explains the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction? |
| 0:54.0 | Probably the fact that the challengers filed their appeal too late. |
| 0:55.2 | Rookie mistake. |
| 0:56.0 | Interesting. |
| 1:01.3 | The court also granted certiorari in Jack Daniels versus VIP products. |
| 1:06.4 | This is an amusing case that examines the relationship between copyright and parody. |
| 1:13.2 | Jack Daniels, as you probably know, makes whiskey, and they have a really distinctive, old-fashioned label. |
| 1:22.8 | VIP products, on the other hand, makes a dog toy that looks very similar to Jack Daniels bottle and label, but with some notable differences. |
| 1:33.6 | Where the liquor bottle says Jack Daniels, the toy says bad spaniels, and includes a cartoon of a dog that looks like it just got caught doing something naughty. |
| 1:41.9 | Now, where the bottle says old number seven brand Tennessee whiskey, the toy says the old number two on your Tennessee carpet. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

