Tech Election - Part 2
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 28 November 2019
⏱️ 52 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
We talk about the impact of different online platforms on the general election campaign, from Twitter and Facebook to WhatsApp and TikTok. Is micro-targeting getting more sophisticated? Is viral messaging getting more important? Or are traditional electioneering techniques still driving voter engagement? Plus we ask whether there's any scope left for a 'December surprise'. With Charles Arthur, former technology editor of the Guardian, and Jennifer Cobbe, from the Cambridge Trust and Technology Initiative.
Talking Points:
In 2017, Labour ran an incredibly successful social media campaign that the mainstream media outlets missed. Is 2017 repeating itself?
- Facebook has gotten more transparent about the ads they are running.
- There doesn’t seem to be a big Labour project, at least on Facebook. The Lib Dems on the other hand have a huge operation.
- Labour has at least a few ads that seem extremely well calibrated.
- Are we more resistant to political messaging on social media now?
This election isn’t a binary choice. There are few single messages that you can push. (The NHS may be the exception.)
- But at the end of the day, the electoral system tends to force a binary choice. Is it old politics or new technology?
- The messages are relatively old school. Time spent on doorsteps may still be more valuable than a Facebook ad.
- But in other ways, things have changed. It’s much easier to publicly screw up. And when new candidates come onto the scene, the first thing people do is scroll through their social media history.
- Do we overblow the consequences of a single screw up?
What is political messaging trying to achieve?
- Persuasion is incredibly difficult. Turnout will be key.
- Labour will need to get out the vote. There’s certainly been a big voter registration push on social media.
- Younger voters are online, but not on Facebook. YouTube, for example, is more important. The Tories don’t seem to have caught on to this.
- In an information economy, are people more likely to switch on right before an election, or switch off?
Mentioned in this episode:
Further Learning:
- Charles’ new book
- Charles’ blog, “The Overspill”
- Jennifer’s Talking Politics Guide to… Machine Learning
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello my name is David Ronseman and this is Talking Politics. On our last episode we talked about what we could do, about the big technology companies, today we're going to talk about what they are doing to this election. |
| 0:21.0 | Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books, which is celebrating its 40th anniversary for the next few months with an unimprovable offer. |
| 0:35.0 | Get a year's subscription and a limited edition LRB tote bag for just 40 pounds by using the URL lrb.me forward slash birthday. |
| 0:52.0 | I'm delighted we have two real experts to guide us through this minefield today and it is a minefield. |
| 0:58.0 | Charles Arthur who was for a long time the technology editor of the Guardian and has written widely about the interface between new technology and old politics. |
| 1:07.0 | Jennifer Cobb who is a lead researcher at the Trust and Technology Initiative in Cambridge. |
| 1:14.0 | So my fear in this election as someone who is not on Facebook so it was a bit of a either refused necologist, somehow never got around to it. |
| 1:24.0 | In 2017 I'm very aware I missed a large part of what was happening in the 2017 election and only in hindsight did the surprising results start to make more sense because there had clearly been another campaign going on that had passed me by. |
| 1:37.0 | Particularly on the Labour side a very effective Facebook campaign and issues were being raised that if like me you got your coverage from mainstream media you just missed so I didn't know that not just Fox hunting but the ivory trade was a big election issue in 2017. |
| 1:54.0 | So I have two fears in 2019 the first of which is that 2017 is repeating itself and I'm missing it and the poll gap is starting to close Labour are cleaning better than people thought and there probably is a Labour campaign I'm not seeing. |
| 2:07.0 | And then the second fear is that I'm one of those people who thinks that it's 2017 again and actually 2019 is a different campaign because two years is a long time in technology. |
| 2:16.0 | So we'll try and deal with both of my anxieties. Charles is this like 2017 again is for instance Labour running a really effective Facebook messaging campaign that's people like me are missing. |
| 2:28.0 | Facebook has got a lot more transparent about the ads that are running so there's now a place you can go on Facebook and see what ads are being run by which parties or by organisations that are paying for it and what they're doing who they're targeting it at and what the message says. |
| 2:44.0 | And from what I've been seeing of that and the WhatsApp group I'm on which is discussing these sorts of things there doesn't seem to be a big Labour project going on the Lib Dems have got a gigantic one going on which has loads of different ads the conservative similarly Labour is sort of third in that group in the Brexit party a bit smaller but there doesn't seem to be this big groundswell of really different ads breaking through certainly not on Facebook. |
| 3:11.0 | So when you say third is that in volume and spend in spend because one of the ads that has broken through to me so I saw it because it gets picked up by mainstream media if that's what Huffington posters is the Rob Delaney ad that Labour ran very very effective piece of political messaging so if people haven't seen it will tweet the link to it he talks about the death of his young child the incredible care he got from the NHS as an American I mean what makes it so effective as he says as an American. |
| 3:40.0 | I love I'm not going to do the accent but he loves the NHS and then we get a message goes further than in Corbyn and said which is if Johnson gets in Donald Trump's children will carve the NHS up between them and when I saw it a couple of days ago 10 million people had seen it which sounds like a lot to me I mean that is big that's a pretty that's a pretty good reach as I call it so even if Labour are spending as much on what you might call the micro ads. |
| 4:09.0 | They seem to have at least in one case the most effective political message that is just being shared. |
| 4:16.0 | Absolutely and I mean the Rob Delaney thing is really interesting I mean I've seen him do a routine a comedy routine under the NHS is actually part of that you know he's so fixated on it but his real power is that he's not a politician so somebody's not a politician doing these sorts of things has much more effect I think and that's part of why he gets shared so widely and it's been interesting that |
| 4:38.0 | very early on in the campaign Labour tried to get a thing going which was what Toria Stereoity has done to me or some of the things to get people sharing hashtags and stuff on Twitter about you know what I don't want to see anymore and what they want to be rid of. |
| 4:52.0 | There's been an effort to make these things go viral but hasn't quite happened as far as I can see and that's been a difference I think from 2017 there hasn't been that same ignition of any of these things apart from the Rob Delaney one. |
| 5:04.0 | Do you have a sense of how to judge these things so Rob Delaney through people sharing it and there's been quite a lot of interesting analytics about who's been sharing it from what I saw. |
| 5:14.0 | It's being shared by people who don't normally share political messaging certainly Labour messaging much more shared by women than by men and so on. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

