The first thing to do is to fix the personnel of the DOJ because the DOJ is stacked with

traders, criminals, people like Charles McGonagall and others in the FBI who serve mafia syndicates.

The DOJ has often been used as a front for organized crime.

I think it's important to specify that the DOJ encompasses a lot of organizations within the broader banner,

some of which are less corrupt than others, but some of which are incredibly corrupt.

The first of which is the FBI itself, which historically has been used for the persecution of activists,

for illegal surveillance on US citizens, is supposed to be used for things like stopping terrorism,

stopping, oh, I don't know, a coup stopping mafia activity.

It increasingly is not.

I mean, honestly, it was never really formed for this purpose.

If you read any biography of J. Edgar Hoover, it was for selective prosecution of elements in American society

who they found threatening, say people like, oh, I don't know, Martin Luther King.

While other people like, say, Meyer Lansky could go on and do whatever they wanted.

They were notorious. The FBI was for denying that the mafia even existed,

and now that we have infiltration of our institutions by organized crime, they continue to do that.

So that's one of these agencies that sometimes I wonder, do we need this?

Should the whole thing just be broken apart?

You keep the parts that are actually out there trying to arrest terrorists and violent groups,

KKK types and whatnot. The rest of it, I'm not sure.

I feel similarly, I look at the DEA and how that has transpired over my life as a child of the

Reagan 80s as a child of an era where they helped the crack epidemic spread, used it as a pretext

to arrest Black and Latino and impoverished Americans.

...