Absolutely and this is a great pathway into using the fact that we have a journalist on the show to talk shit about well

journalists I literally saw you retweet Pulitzer awarding the New York Times for best international

reporting of the year and I almost fell off my fucking chair.

But let me not be an annoying unprofessional podcaster shit talking to respected men and women over at the New York Times.

Could you please tell us just how astronomically they've been fucking up with their coverage of the

Palestinian plight recently, of course we'd need like 20 hours to cover the last 80 years?

You know, sometimes I think these awards are really just set up to give people like us aneurisms.

Because when in the New York Times has been home to some of the most deceptive, blatantly deceitful, and pathetic journalism anywhere in the world.

The Times has published such banging headlines like Lives ended in Gaza or at least nine killed as

tank rounds hit UN shelter. Hmm I wonder who did that. Hmm, nobody can possibly figure

out this difficult conundrum or stuff like disastrous convoy was part of new Israeli effort to hand out more aid to Gaza.

That's talking about the flower massacre where Israel shot I believe 700 people

including 100 people who died in fact more than 100 people. So the times has

been at the forefront of trying to deceive and trying to cloud the issue of what's going on in Gaza

and make things that are very simple to understand, very difficult to understand.

And one example of this is the extraordinary thing

where they changed their headline twice

from Israeli strike kills hundreds

in hospital Palestinian officials today. They changed it to at least 500 dead in

strike on Gaza, hospital, Palestinians say. So they removed the Israeli part and then they

changed it again to say at least 500 dead in blast at Gaza Hospital,

Palestinians say.

...