meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Know Your Enemy

TEASER: Disinformation, Peter Thiel, and the Vibe Shift (w/ Joe Bernstein)

Know Your Enemy

Matthew Sitman

Right Wing, National Review, History, Socialists, Reactionaries, Conservative Movement, Conservatism, News, Society & Culture, Ronald Reagan, Leftists Look At Conservatism, William F Buckley, Politics

4.71.8K Ratings

🗓️ 11 March 2022

⏱️ 3 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sam talks to Buzzfeed's Joe Bernstein about the "disinformation industry" and why Peter Thiel is funding anti-woke art in New York City.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

There are all these metaphors about disinformation that relate it to pollutants, to corporate polluters,

0:09.0

but you observed that there's this weird thing going on, where usually if you're being accused

0:13.8

of being a polluter, which is to say, if you're a social media platform, Facebook, Twitter,

0:19.9

whatever, you're being accused of being a polluter, you would think they would go,

0:23.6

no, no, no, there is no polluting going on. Instead, these people go, yes, disinformation is a big

0:28.3

problem. We're going to fund a bunch of research on it. We're going to have in-house scholars

0:32.0

to work on it. We're all taking this very, very seriously. This is one of the great conceptual

0:36.8

maneuvers of your piece is to explain why that is. Why is it that there's a sort of perverse

0:41.6

incentive on the part of the platforms to agree that disinformation is real, has an effect on the

0:47.1

world, and that they are, in fact, pervading it? One of the books that I was spending a ton of time

0:52.5

thinking about when I wrote this piece is a book by the technologist Tim Wong, who's a brilliant guy,

0:57.6

and his book is just about how online advertising is in house of cards. I was thinking about that as

1:04.0

I was thinking about disinformation, and as you said, why these technologists or by these platforms

1:09.2

are incentivized to claim that disinformation is real and a problem. That is, if you take out the

1:16.9

value judgment of good and bad information, and you just think about what platforms want to do,

1:22.3

which is sell ads, of course, they want to make the claim that information on their

1:27.5

platforms can influence people and impel them to action, right? Make a purchasing decision,

1:36.8

or pull the lever for Donald Trump. If we can elect an idiot celebrity president,

1:42.4

then Goddamn, we can sell your fucking boots. Completely, yeah. Of course, what the

1:47.4

subscribers is a long debate over whether or not advertising actually works. I don't want to

1:53.5

get into Frekenomics territory, but I think it's in the advertisers interest to communicate

1:59.9

that advertising works. While advertising is getting more and more targeted and narrow all the time,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Matthew Sitman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Matthew Sitman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.