Crypto doesn't sleep, so neither do we.

Crack-in client support is available 24-7, 365 days a year by call, chat, or email.

We're here for you whenever you need us.

Give us a shout at crackin.com forward slash support proof,

not investment advice. Crypto trading involves risk of loss.

On Tuesday, this little thing popped up on Twitter.

A hyperlink under two of the president's tweets, with a blue exclamation point.

It said, get the facts about mail-in ballots, and if you clicked on the link, it led to news articles.

They explained that the president's tweets, which claim things like, and I'm quoting here,

there is no way, zero, that mail-in ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent, or in fact unsubstantiated.

When you saw that, what was your reaction?

Well, it's always surprising when Twitter takes action.

Twitter is the most slow-moving of our tech companies, and their MO is to consider things for many years,

and then sort of come up with a half-measure after the fact.

That's Casey Newton. He's the Silicon Valley editor for the Verge,

and he's written about Twitter's decision-making process a lot over the past few years.

How the company is dealt with online harassment, how they've been slowed,

or remove people like conspiracy theorist Alex Jones,

and how, since the 2016 election, Twitter has been trying to figure out what to do

when the president tweets something inaccurate, especially about voting.

I think a lot of people had sort of given up on the idea that Twitter would ever take any action,

because there had been so many previous Trump tweets that seemed to some people to have gone over that line.

...