meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
What Next | Daily News and Analysis

TBD | The Hackers Who Took Down the Colonial Pipeline

What Next | Daily News and Analysis

Slate Podcasts

News, Daily News, News Commentary

4.32.4K Ratings

🗓️ 21 May 2021

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Last week, a hacker group called DarkSide shut down the Colonial Pipeline, which supplies 45 percent of the fuel consumed on the East Coast. Gas prices skyrocketed, people started hoarding gas, and DarkSide walked away with over $4 million in Bitcoin. How did they do it? And what makes this hack different from those we’ve seen before? Guest: David Uberti, cybersecurity reporter at the Wall Street Journal Host Lizzie O’Leary Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

A quick warning before we get started, there is a little salty language in today's episode.

0:09.2

When the colonial pipeline system got hacked and the gas market across the east coast was

0:13.8

paralyzed and prices shot up, I kept thinking about something David Uberty told me last year.

0:20.5

David covers cybersecurity for the Wall Street Journal and he writes a lot about ransomware

0:25.2

attacks where hackers lock up a company's data in demand for ransom. And that's what happened to

0:30.9

colonial. What he told me was that the hackers who do this think a lot about their reputations.

0:38.3

So when I called him up this week, I had to ask about that. They wanted me known as like

0:43.5

being easy to work with, having good customer service. Why? Well, I think as with any enterprise,

0:51.0

you really have a focus on the brand. Yeah, even cyber criminals have a brand. In the private sector,

0:57.7

you know, if I am trying to work with a different company in the US, totally legitimate reasons,

1:03.6

I worry about that company's brand. And the same is true in some respects for hacking groups.

1:13.4

It just seems to me like, if you're thinking about dark side, this group that's apparently linked

1:18.8

to hacking the colonial pipeline, paralyzing the East Coast gas market, it seems like that's pretty

1:25.6

bad for your brand. Not exactly a shining moment for them. So I mean, to take a step back,

1:31.8

the reason why a brand is important is because when a hacking group attacks a particular company,

1:37.2

they get inside their computer systems, they deploy ransomware. Executives at that company have to

1:42.8

decide to what extent do we trust this group? They got to ask, are these hackers going to let us

1:48.3

run the pipeline again? Get gas to millions of angry drivers, if we pay up, basically should we

1:54.4

pay the ransom that they're asking for? Some of these companies that negotiate ransoms

2:00.3

for victims, they basically keep dossiers about some of these ransomware organizations. They do

2:05.9

brand and market research to see which hacking groups are reliable in sort of a weird criminal

2:12.4

way, and which are not to be trusted. Most of the time, these negotiations are quiet. You and I

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.