Hi and welcome to Sabir reasons malicious life I'm Ran Levy. As far back as 1950 people began comprehending the vast opportunities unlocked by

computing. The computers of that age were gargantuan in size, humongous things operated by

punched cards, but it was clear that their power would only increase.

Alan Turing, a British mathematician who could be described as the profit of the computer

age, was brazen enough to raise an unprecedented question.

Can machines think?

Although it was clear that the primitive computers of Turing's time could not think,

he was curious to know how we could determine what constitutes as

artificial thinking.

So Turing came up with the imitation game, now popularly known as the Turing test. Three parties take part in this test.

One evaluator and two players, A and B. One of the two players is a computer, but the evaluator does not know which

one. He is given a keyboard and a restricted communication channel where only text messages can be transferred, basically a chat.

The evaluator has to talk with both players and find out which one is the computer. If you cannot reliably determine who's the computer

and who's the human being, then the computer has successfully passed the test.

The implication the test. The implications of a computer passing the Turing test are not to be understated.

After all, what's the practical difference between a computer that can imitate a person and a real person?

Think of all the different jobs that can be done by a computer that can write like a regular human being,

from customer service to teaching to writing novels and psychotherapy.

But passing the Turing test is no easy task.

Even GPT 3, the groundbreaking language model released last year by Open AI can usually keep up a conversation for

four or five questions before entering a surreal territory of insane answers

such as it takes two rainbows to jump from Hawaii to 17.

...