I'd like to give our theist call as the benefit of the doubt, but I can't.

Be it evolution, consciousness, the origins of the cosmos, any phenomena that we have,

good naturalist explanations for plenty of evidence behind.

I'm so, so tired of it always boiling down too.

I don't understand this, therefore it must be God.

Your personal incredulity is causing you to commit the God of the Gaps fallacy,

and more than that, you're making gaps to shove your God into.

God has never been in those gaps, ever. But if you disagree, call the show. Let's start now.

Welcome, everyone. Today is August 10th, 2025. I'm your host, Dr. Ben, and with me today is Jamie the Blind

Limey. How are you doing, Jamie? I am a facsimile of a copy of a man in a place in a hat without a

hat. I'm fine. I'm also very silly today. Yeah, yeah, and especially talking about God of the Gapes, sounds like there's

a lot of frustration with more bias going back to this presuppositional position of, well,

something must be real there for God and not just being willing to say, you know, maybe we don't

know the answer to everything.

So I'm definitely frustrated about that as well.

Yeah.

I mean, people say that God is the most likely answer or the most logical answer or the most, you know, believable answer.

It's like, well, it's an answer, but in my estimation, not a very good one because because I like evidence to be provided for such things rather than just, but it has to be, it just has to be.

I find that not at all compelling, and I've been at this long enough now, to now find it just grating, just tiring.

There are people who've been in this space a lot longer than me and have a lot more credentials than I do,

and much like yourself.

Ben, I don't know how you have just gone completely stark raving bonkers about it having to deal with the same arguments over and over and over again.

...