meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The a16z Show

Taking the Pulse on Medical Device Security

The a16z Show

a16z

Culture, Business, Science, Disruption, Technology, Software Eating The World, Entrepreneurship, Innovation

4.2 • 1.2K Ratings

🗓️ 22 July 2020

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

with @AndreaCoravos, @beauwoods, and @omnivorousread Many don’t realize we even need to think about the possibility of security hacks when it comes to things like pacemakers, insulin pumps, and more. But when bits and bytes meet flesh and blood, security becomes literally a life or death concern. So what are the issues and risks we need to be aware of in exposing security vulnerabilities in connected biomedical devices? This conversation—with Beau Woods, Cyber Safety Innovation Fellow with the Atlantic Council, part of the I Am The Cavalry grassroots security initiative, Founder/CEO of Stratigos Security; Andy Coravos, co-founder and CEO of Elektra Labs, advisor to the Biohacking Village at DEF CON (both of whom were formerly EIRs at the FDA); and a16z's Hanne Tidnam covers how we should begin to think about addressing these security issues in the biomedical device space. What are the frameworks that should guide our conversations, and how and when (and which!) stakeholders should be incentivized to address these challenges? How did the FDA begin to think about security as part of the safety of all medical devices, including software as a medical device, and how we should think about understanding, monitoring, and updating the security of these devices—from philosophical statements to on-the-ground practical fixes and updates?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi and welcome to the A16Z podcast. I'm Hannah. What we're talking about today is the

0:05.5

world of where bits and bites meet flesh and blood, the security of medical

0:09.8

devices. Many don't realize we even need to think about the possibility of security hacks

0:14.4

when it comes to things like pacemakers and insulin pumps and more. So what are the

0:19.0

issues and risks we need to be aware of in exposing security vulnerabilities in biomedical devices.

0:25.4

This conversation with Bo Woods, Cybersecurity Innovation Fellow with the Atlantic Council,

0:30.4

part of the I am the Cavalry Grassroots Security Initiative and founder and CEO of Stradigo Security and Andy Caravos, co-founder and CEO of Electro Labs,

0:40.5

advisor to the Biohacking Village at Defcon, both of whom were formerly EIRs at the FDA,

0:46.4

and myself, looks at how we begin to think about addressing these security issues in

0:51.0

the biomedical device space, the frameworks that should guide our

0:54.6

conversations and thinking, and how and when stakeholders should be incentivized to address

0:59.6

these challenges. We begin with stories of how some of the first security researchers discovered these issues,

1:06.0

but we also talk about how the FDA began to think about security as part of the safety of all medical devices,

1:12.0

including software as a medical device, and how we should think

1:15.4

about understanding, monitoring, and updating the security of these devices from philosophical

1:21.1

North Star's statements to on-the-ground practical fixes and updates.

1:26.0

I'd probably start the story around 2010-2011

1:30.0

when a security researcher and diabetic patient named Jay Radcliffe used an insulin pump to dose himself

1:37.6

whenever he needed to add insulin to his body. And he had a couple of incidents where just through potential misuse or through accident,

1:46.0

where he had some pretty severe potential for harm.

1:49.0

And because he was a security researcher, he started saying,

1:52.0

well, if this is what it could happen with accidents,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from a16z, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of a16z and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright Š Tapesearch 2026.