meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Daily Signal Podcast

Supreme Court to Decide Major Transgender Case, Pete Hegseth’s Nomination In Trouble, Trump Names His Pick to Head NASA | Dec. 4

The Daily Signal Podcast

The Daily Signal

News, Government, Politics, Daily News

4.61.2K Ratings

🗓️ 4 December 2024

⏱️ 11 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

TOP NEWS | On today’s Daily Signal Top News, we break down: The Supreme Court hears oral arguments for a major transgender case. The big question before the court is: Can a state ban transgender treatments on minors?  Trump might replace Pete Hegseth - his pick to lead the Defense Department — with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Trump taps Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Relevant Links:  More Coverage Supreme Court Transgender Case:  Videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGy7M_cQsBk https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oav_Q47LBnU  Articles: https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/12/03/supreme-court-case-exposes-transgender-medical-scandal-epic-proportions/  Daily Signal Internship Application: https://www.heritage.org/young-leaders-program  Listen to other podcasts from The Daily Signal: https://www.dailysignal.com/podcasts/ Get daily conservative news you can trust from our Morning Bell newsletter: DailySignal.com/morningbellsubscription   Listen to more Heritage podcasts: https://www.heritage.org/podcasts Sign up for The Agenda newsletter — the lowdown on top issues conservatives need to know about each week: https://www.heritage.org/agenda

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Can a state ban transgender treatments on minors?

0:05.5

The Supreme Court will decide.

0:07.7

I'm Virginia Allen, and this is the Daily Signal's top news in 10 for Wednesday, December 4th.

0:20.1

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today for a major transgender case.

0:25.0

The big question before the court is can a state ban transgender treatments on minors?

0:31.9

Tennessee passed a law banning such treatments on anyone under the age of 18.

0:36.8

But attorneys representing the United States

0:39.0

argued that such a ban is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

0:44.6

Now, the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution was passed following the Civil War to prevent

0:49.1

discrimination against blacks. Heritage Foundation Senior Legal fellow Sarah Partial Perry told the Daily

0:55.8

Signal's Problematic Women podcast that the Supreme Court has applied the Equal Protection

1:01.0

Clause only to immutable characteristics, things like race, sex, or nationality, never to something

1:08.5

like gender identity. The Supreme Court has never determined that something that is subjective and internal,

1:16.4

something that you choose and you act upon, is sufficient for constitutional protection.

1:22.9

In fact, they've been asked to give protection to education level or poverty status.

1:30.3

Both times the Supreme Court has said, no way.

1:33.1

We want to keep it, those immutable characteristics.

1:36.3

That's the clean line right here with the Constitution.

1:40.1

The Daily Signals, Elizabeth Mitchell, was inside the Supreme Court watching the arguments

1:44.7

before the justices this morning.

1:46.7

Elizabeth, thanks for being here.

1:48.8

Thanks, Virginia.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Daily Signal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Daily Signal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.