It's the Brian Lairn Show and WNYC. Welcome back, everybody. I'm Bridget Bergen, filling in for Brian today.

As you heard earlier in the show on this final Supreme Court opinion day of the term.

The court weighed in on the question of former President Trump's immunity from prosecution

over his attempts to block the results of the 2020 election.

It was a six-three decision along ideological lines with Chief Justice Roberts, writing the majority opinion.

We're joined again by Aziz Huck, Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School,

an author of the forthcoming, The Rule of Law, a very short introduction.

Hello, Aziz, and welcome.

Thanks for being back on the Brian Laird Show.

Thanks for having me, Bridgett.

And listeners, as promised, we can take some calls on this decision.

Please call or text with your questions, your thoughts, your reactions to the ruling in this

immunity case or any of the other cases.

The number is 212-433 W-N-YC.

That's 212-433-9692.

And Azizhuk, the court sent this back down to the lower court

to reevaluate the charges against the former president

in light of their guidance on immunity. How much guidance

did they actually set? I think that they said several things that the district court in the

first instance will have to apply as new rules of constitutional law.

And the application of those rules is likely to involve a potentially lengthy

fight over evidence and the shape of the indictment, in which Trump's lawyers will be advantaged by several things

...