Talking Feds is sponsored by our friends at Total Wine and More,

rewarding curious connoisseurs with a wondrous selection of wine, spirits, and beers.

Now, the sponsors of this bill, the House Bill in Mississippi,

said we're doing it because we have new justices.

Will this institution survive the stench that this creates

in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?

Welcome to Talking Feds, a round table that brings together prominent figures from government

law and journalism for a dynamic discussion of the most important topics of the day.

I'm Harry Littman.

Should we be surprised?

Roe vs Wade has been under siege at scenes from the day it issued nearly 50 years ago.

Legal and political conservatives have reserved a special measure of ranker for a case they

see as the epitome of judicial activism and political leaders nearly all.

Men have never ceased to make hay from railing against the case.

And the prevalence of abortion in the United States figures suggest about one in every

four American women have abortions in their lifetimes is a continuing source of outrage

for pro-life forces.

If thus was a smart political move for Donald Trump, himself a late convert to the pro-life

position.

To promise the appointment of justices of the Supreme Court who would overturn Roe vs. Wade,

and it appears to have succeeded.

The Supreme Court heard argument in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization this

...